Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Russian Nuclear Submarine Will Not Enter Serial Production
RIA Novosti via Space War ^ | 6/24/2010 | RIA Novosti via Space War

Posted on 06/23/2010 9:08:15 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

A fourth-generation Russian nuclear-powered multipurpose attack submarine that was floated out on Tuesday is too expensive for serial production, a business daily said on Wednesday. On Tuesday, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev arrived in the northern port of Severodvinsk to attend the official float-out ceremony.

The construction of the Severodvinsk, the first Project 885 Yasen (Graney) class submarine, began in 1993 at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, but has since been dogged by financial setbacks.

Russia planned to float out the submarine on May 7 to mark the 65th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in May 1945.

Russia's Vedomosti daily said the price of the strategic project was kept secret, but the estimated cost reached $1 billion.

Mikhail Barabanov, the editor-in-chief of Moscow Defense Brief magazine, said the submarine's cost was too high to make it viable for serial production.

Barabanov told Vedomosti that the U.S. Navy did not produce a large number of advanced Sea Wolf submarines, similar to the Severodvinsk vessel, since they were too expensive. Instead of these, they use cheaper and unsophisticated Virginia-class submarines.

The expert said the Russian Navy would probably replace the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine with a more affordable analogue. Barabanov said the second Yasen (Graney) class submarine Kazan was the most probable alternative to the Severodvinsk submarine.

Russian experts expect Graney-class submarines to boost the Navy's operational effectiveness and combat capabilities.

(Excerpt) Read more at spacewar.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: attacksubmarine; graneyclass; russiannavy; ssn; submarine

1 posted on 06/23/2010 9:08:17 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The Russian military apparatus is slowly dying
2 posted on 06/23/2010 9:11:16 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

So is ours. They can’t even procure a frigate or a fighter jet that works anymore.


3 posted on 06/23/2010 9:15:51 PM PDT by omega4179 (www.jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: omega4179
I disagree. The Russian Military apparatus is so riddled with outdated technology and corruption is has ceased to function. We are still the world's leader in technology and manufacturing.
4 posted on 06/23/2010 9:18:41 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2531479/posts


5 posted on 06/23/2010 9:21:55 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

1. Twenty years to develop.

2. Ten to make it work.

3. Ten more to phase it out.


6 posted on 06/23/2010 9:37:01 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Just curious, have you seen anything on the weight capacity of this sub?


7 posted on 06/23/2010 9:39:52 PM PDT by theanchoragedailyruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theanchoragedailyruse

The displacement of the Graney Class is 5,800-7,700-9,500 surfaced and 8,600-13,800 submerged.The submarine’s armament includes 24 cruise missiles.


8 posted on 06/23/2010 9:45:27 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Interesting.

Here is why...

http://redcounty.com/are-submarine-supertankers-alaska%E2%80%99s-future/34324

“...On September 6, the official site of the city of Sarov (www.adm.sarov.ru) reported on a visit to the city by the commander of the submarine Sarov Capt. 1st Rank Sergey Kroshkin. In the text, it stated that the Sarov was still in the stocks at the Severodvinsk but “the chief commander of the Navy has set the task of finishing work by the end of the year.” The number of the submarine project was given: 20120 and its technical and tactical characteristics as well. those data indicate that the new submarine is very similar to the Project 877 Paltus (Halibut) diesel submarine, but its water displacement is greater (3950 vs. 3050 tons).

On September 11, that information disappeared from the site, but it had already been reprinted by the local media. Russian Navy press service representative Alexander Smirnov told Kommersant, that he “knows nothing” about the Project 20120. Kommersant contacted the Zvezdochka shipbuilding enterprise and Northern Machine Building Enterprise (Sevmash) in Severodvinsk for commentary about the submarine. A Zvezdochka spokesman stated that no new submarines are being built there. Sevmash declined to answer Kommersant’s questions. The Rubin central design bureau, a leading developer of submarines, also declined to confirm or deny its involvement with the Project 20120.”

(...)

“...Displacement of a Rubin designed submarine cargo tanker

TsKB-18 also developed the draft for Project 626, a smaller landing ship-transport ship intended for Arctic operations. The ship would have had a surface displacement of some 3,480 tons and was intended to carry 165 troops and 330 tons of fuel or four T-34 tanks for transfer ashore.”

Gazprom was investing in a submarine that was being built there.

Gazprom has just recently built a sea floor platform for oil and gas. The platform supports a submarine tanker.

On April 7th 2007 in Anchorage, the following was presented on submarine tankers.

http://www.confmanager.com/communities/c680/files/hidden/Presentations/Ext-26_LNG_Submarine_Technologies.pdf


9 posted on 06/23/2010 10:43:44 PM PDT by theanchoragedailyruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: theanchoragedailyruse

http://www.ocnus.net/artman2/publish/Defence_Arms_13/One-Way-to-Disarm.shtml


10 posted on 06/23/2010 10:50:05 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson