Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

I agree with you. I really do. There have been plenty of not-so-good-looking first ladies, and their natural physical attributes should not matter one whit. Character trumps looks, period.

However, if indeed Michelle is again going under the knife, that in itself is shallow enough to merit comment.

As first spouse, she has responsibilities, including demonstrating class and grace in public appearances. That is not about looks, but it is about good judgement in what she says and wears.

(I’m also tired of paying for her regular “vacations.”)


50 posted on 06/23/2010 9:25:51 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah
There have been plenty of not-so-good-looking first ladies, and their natural physical attributes should not matter one whit. Character trumps looks, period.

What drives it is the liberal media's constant drumming of her being so "elegant" and "beautiful". And also this great "fashion icon". They have featured her on the cover of many magazines.

55 posted on 06/23/2010 9:33:07 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: All

Michelle obama is at least consistent: she’s damned ugly on the inside as well...


86 posted on 06/23/2010 11:12:21 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson