Posted on 06/23/2010 8:50:59 AM PDT by llevrok
Texas Tech, that bastion of Americanism way out there in Lubbock, has done it again.
This time they're not protesting a statue that allegedly features Commies and lesbians, nor are they linking tattoos to social deviance.
This time, they're saying liberals hate Sarah Palin because she's beautiful, and libs prefer dogs like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton and Elena Kagan. Well, at least one Red Raider is.
A.W.R. Hawkins writes an online column for the conservative Human Events and proudly lists in his bio that he has a Ph.D. in military history from Tech. Which makes him an expert on dames, apparently.
Libs and Dems hate Sarah Palin because she's for smaller government, he writes in his latest column; they hate her because she didn't go to an Ivy League school and they hate her because "she chose to carry her Down Syndrome baby to term instead of aborting it. (That last one really drives them crazy.)"
But what really sets these abortion-loving atheists off? "[A]ll these reasons are trumped by the fact that they despise her beauty," he writes.
As a member of the media, we supposedly knew this already:
The double standard resides here: When Palin dresses in nice clothes reporters act like she's being ostentatious, but when Mrs. Obama does it reporters are taken aback by her glamour. Yet the dirty little secret is that Palin could don a $90.00 dress from Wal-Mart and steal the show from a diamond covered Mrs. Obama any day, and the media knows it. Got it. The analysis goes even deeper, hard as it may be to believe:
[T]he left criticizes that which they fear. We also have to keep in mind the fact that all the names they throw at Palin are really code words for "Dang, that woman looks good."
And who can blame them for noticing? After all, since the 1930s they've spent their time supporting women who looked like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton, Janet Reno, Tipper Gore, and Elena Kagan.
Suffice it to say there isn't a lot of pinup potential in that list. Texas Tech represent!!! No fatties allowed!
I did a search for both:
http://newsbird.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/michelle-obama-plastic-surgery/
http://plasticsergeant.com/barack-obamas-nose-job
I thought this was hilarious.. this should be a thread by itself LOL:
http://www.bettyconfidential.com/ar/ld/a/25_facts_about_Michelle_Obama.html
Guns Up! Sarah over any of them, any day....well, except my wife;)
In this image, Kagen has to let some air in for the ‘Lads’ to breathe...
Michelle obama is at least consistent: she’s damned ugly on the inside as well...
The left hates her because they know perfectly well if they had somebody like her, except center-left, she’d be, electorally speaking, like gold to them. And they don’t have anybody like her. And they’re not likely to any time soon, if ever.
No question Lib women. More accurately, older, women feel threatened. If they’ve been dumped, forget it, they can’t even watch Fox news. Too many gorgeous newscasters. And since they are too good looking, they obviously are not qualified.
Exactly. I don't believe in poking fun at physical appearances, but they are begging for it. In that vein:
|
 |
Venus vs. the Mud Fence.
.
Sarah is a hotty MILF
Once Todd is out of the picture of course
Attractiveness for me at least depends in a large part on content of character. If you can consider just surface looks, MO is not bad looking. when you take into account her character, a large sack of progressive manure, it subtracts all the way to exceedingly ugly.
Here she is at the Justice Department today:
If those are "improvements," she needs to ask for her money back.
those fabulously “toned” arms
No kidding.
And on top of that they claimed they had allergies that prevented them from rescuing a trembling dog from death row
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.