“Citizenship is based on the allegiance of the parents.”
Wrong. That is why we have naturalized citizens, and why a child born of immigrants is STILL an American.
You are claiming that Obama is not only not a NBC (which has a weak case), but that he is not a citizen at all - which is just stupid.
Citizenship is a contract between the person & the state/national government for protection. A child can NOT enter into a contract without the consent of the parent so please show me the law that says that alien parents under US law have the right to consent to a foreign nationality for their children. Children rely on their parents for protection, thus it is the protection of the government that the parents are members of that has the strongest tie to the child. This is the law of nature & natures God that is written in the Declaration of Independence and from which ALL state & national laws have been based off of. As Cato said, look to the laws of the United Netherlands(Scandinavia) and see what your new government will look like. He didn't say the laws of the Great Britain, for what would the point of the revolution then been?
obama is a native born citizen assuming that he was born in Hawaii(?). If he was born in Kenya ,his mother was too young to convey citizenship and that would make him a kenyan national.Children of naturalized(full allegiance) citizens are Natural born citizens .A child born to immigrants ( persons going though the immigration process) but are not yet Naturalized are native born (Wong Kim Ark). If obama was born in Hawaii he is a native born citizen( per U.S. supreme court) and ineligible to be President.