[MozarkDawg]

Here's a flaw in your theory: a married woman may abort her husband's child, the law allows it, society does not condemn her for it and because it's *her body*, he has no say so whatever, but is left to grieve alone.

Not all men are inherently without conscience or consideration, and I see it as unfair to paint with the broad brush that you do.

[Chickensoup]

Here’s a flaw in your theory: a married woman may abort her husband’s child, the law allows it, society does not condemn her for it and because it’s *her body*, he has no say so whatever, but is left to grieve alone.
Not all men are inherently without conscience or consideration, and I see it as unfair to paint with the broad brush that you do.

I did not say that this is a good or correct law. Married men have interest in their wives pregnancy. I never said that men are without a conscience, I said that they should wait for marriage and keep it zipped. In my perfect world an unmarried man has no claim on an infant.