Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

Perhaps the Notary, Williamson, has some legal liability in these two forms being different.

People need to go to jail for this.


52 posted on 06/20/2010 9:28:45 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Balata
Perhaps the Notary, Williamson, has some legal liability in these two forms being different.

Nope. A Notary is only certifying that the person signed the document in their presence. They are not certifying the truthfulness of the signed document.

68 posted on 06/21/2010 12:29:45 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Balata
Perhaps the Notary, Williamson, has some legal liability in these two forms being different.

The notary who signs and stamps a sworn affidavit is only attesting to the fact that the person who swears out the affidavit is the person that the affiant claims to be. The Notary is not responsible for the truth of the content of the affidavit; the affiant is.

People need to go to jail for this.

Yes, if Obama is not constitutionally qualified for the presidency, whoever swore out that false affidavit has committed perjury.

70 posted on 06/21/2010 1:47:59 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson