“Do you lemmings really expect me to be surprised that my criticism of America’s neo-con anchorman flew right over your heads?”
Your criticism of Rush was that he was objecting to the fascist approach of the current administration. You somehow extrapolated that Rush is a defender of BP. You have not yet refuted that interpretation.
“CSM, know your limits...you confuse, easily.”
Yet you offer no clarification disputing that you have attacked Rush for his objection to fascism. Hence, using your logical progression, it should be noted that you must support fascism.
Do you stand by your logic or not?
My original post that confused you:
"Rush is doing a marvelous job of shilling for Barack Petroleum. Is he aware that BP is a founding supporter of Cap & Trade legislation? I know he knows about BP’s campaign contributions to ObaMao. I wish someone would explain to America’s neo-con anchorman the difference between corporatism, and capitalism."
You see, CSM, under corporatism, the government and corporations work together to circumvent the free market.
News flash: Not all corporations are capitalist.
I have no sympathy for ObaMao, or Barack Petroleum.
Are you aware that it was a BP company man who overruled the Transocean crew, and forced the conditions that caused the explosion in the first place?
Are you aware that BP made a huge donation to the ObaMao campaign?
Are you aware that BP was a founding supporter of Cap & Trade legislation?
If that legislation goes through do you suppose Big Oil will see increased profits due to reduced supply?