One might consider that part of their "dues to society" include losing the right to vote.
One shouldn't do the crime if they can't do the time.
I don’t.
If a person is so dangerous that they can’t even be trusted to vote, why were they released?
Again, creating a permanant under-class is not a workable option. Proven.
So you are saying that no amount of rehabilitation makes a difference? Once a low-life always a low-life?