Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer

I don’t.
If a person is so dangerous that they can’t even be trusted to vote, why were they released?

Again, creating a permanant under-class is not a workable option. Proven.


12 posted on 06/16/2010 12:41:50 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE

“If a person is so dangerous that they can’t even be trusted to vote, why were they released?”

Libtards....next question.


15 posted on 06/16/2010 12:44:12 PM PDT by Crim (The Obama Doctrine : A doctrine based on complete ignorance,applied with extreme incompitence..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SJSAMPLE
Again, creating a permanant under-class is not a workable option. Proven.

The time to consider the entire punishment, including jail time, fines and penalties, parole, and the loss of rights would be BEFORE one commits the crime, not after. If you're concerned about felons losing the right to vote AS PART OF THEIR PUNISHMENT, then avoid becoming a felon.

20 posted on 06/16/2010 12:52:32 PM PDT by meyer (Big government is the enemy of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson