Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Korean Air Force decommissions F-4D jets
The Korea Times ^ | 06-16-2010 | Jung Sung-ki

Posted on 06/16/2010 8:51:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Korean Air Force decommissions F-4D jets

By Jung Sung-ki

Staff reporter

A squadron of F-4D Phantom fighter jets conducted its last flight Wednesday, ending its 41 years of service with the ROK Air Force.

A ceremony for the decommissioning of the aircraft was held at the 11th Fighter Wing in Daegu, about 300 kilometers south of Seoul.

Boeing-built F-15K Slam Eagle fighters will replace the older aircraft.

“Though the F-4D aircraft is fading into the mist of history, their spirit will be succeeded by the F-15K, which will further bolster our air defense,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Lee Kye-hoon said at the ceremony. Hundreds of guests, including former F-4 pilots, attended the event.

The 151st Fighter Squadron of the ROK Air Force has operated about 60 F-4Ds since 1969. The twin-engine aircraft, nicknamed “MIG Killer,” can cruise at a top speed of Mach 2.3 and has an operational range of 1,260 kilometers.

Under a 2007 deal, the Air Force is receiving up-to-date F-15K aircraft from U.S. aerospace giant Boeing.

In 2002, the F-15 aircraft was selected for the 40-plane, $4.2-billion first-phase plan of the F-X fighter modernization program aimed at buying 120 high-end fighter jets by 2020.

The Boeing Company won the second-phase deal in 2008 to provide 20 more aircraft. The deal was valued at $2.3 billion.

The F-15K can fly air-to-ground, air-to-air and air-to-sea missions day or night in any weather. It has a 23,000-pound payload and can fly at a maximum speed of Mach 2.3 with a combat radius of 1,800 kilometers. gallantjung@koreatimes.co.kr


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f15k; f4; rokaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: sukhoi-30mki

to me, the F4 is the iconic image of Vietnam era fighters. I get a little nostalgic looking at planes like that.


21 posted on 06/16/2010 9:31:37 AM PDT by llevrok (I am a stranger in the country I was born and raised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

‘Flying The Bus’


22 posted on 06/16/2010 9:35:10 AM PDT by Leisler ("Over time they create a legal system that plunders and a moral code that glorifies it." F. Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Ya ever ground the klystron to the RSG chassis and not quite get yer finger out of the way?

There I was, young student in my first RAG squadron, tuning the klystron for my first time. Standing on an aluminum ladder, knees shaking. Suddenly the 2A2 or 2A5 (?) started arcing.

I was standing behind the tech rep, Bob Price, holding his shoulders, before the berylium screwdriver even hit the floor, asking "What happened?"

He probably told that story for years of TT being scared of electrons.
23 posted on 06/16/2010 9:42:29 AM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VOA
20mm cannon. Centerline pod would also take a fuel tank, or probably a chaff and flare dispenser or anything else mission-necessary. Outboard pylons appear to be fuel. Can also carry luggage compartments for getting pilot's golf clubs to Homestead, or other Florida base with nice weather and golf courses.

F-4E incorporated the cannon in the nose. Made it harder to shoot the nose-gear off.

24 posted on 06/16/2010 9:43:44 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Folks don’t realize how big it was, made our A-4s look
tiny.Nothing quite like the sound of those two engines
in afterburner. Our living quarters were about a mile
from the runway but you couldn’t talk when one was taking
off. We got used to it but on tapes we sent home the
conversation would just be replaced by this ROAR.

They brought some up to Chu Lai back when we just had
matting runways and it was amazing watching it buck
down the runway on take off.........of course they
lost some bombs and racks too. Was nearly struck
by shrapnel from a 500 lb. frag. Most of the time they
didn’t have enough travel to arm but this one went off
about 200 yds away from our flight line. A chunk
the size of a hamburger bounced off the main strut of
the bird we were changing the brakes on, about six inches
above our heads and went into the belly tank.
the guy working with me and I cut it in half, I kept it
for years but lost it along the way. Nasty, sharp, jagged
edges.


25 posted on 06/16/2010 9:44:33 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

Yep. We were golden. We actually knew how to use an o’scope, a TDR, and really troubleshoot gripes. Even used schematics to figure stuff out. Wow. I must be old. LOL


26 posted on 06/16/2010 9:44:34 AM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
Even used schematics to figure stuff out.

There was no schematic on how to get all the wires back into an ACRP once you'd opened it. :)

27 posted on 06/16/2010 9:50:52 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Awesome! Thanks for your service btw.

I can remember when there were only a few birds requiring bridles to launch off a carrier. Then, there were none. And all of them required a sheerable cylinder of steel to overcome the force of the catapults. Made to some exact specs I bet.

Now, there is a reusable holdback device that can be used again and again, and all of them have a drop down launch bar that fits into the shuttle . Amazing how far we have come.
28 posted on 06/16/2010 9:56:43 AM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gundog
The outboard pylons would also hold the 20mm gun pod. I saw that configuration many times at the Kunsan Resort & Spa.

Very cool actually, three 20mm pods hanging off the beast - whatever the target is, death will be very quick!

29 posted on 06/16/2010 9:59:05 AM PDT by LasVegasMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac

Good God! Probably better than the air brake.


30 posted on 06/16/2010 10:03:57 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A friend was a McDonnell Douglas engineer. His comment, the F4 was proof that if you put a big enough motor on a barn door, it will fly.


31 posted on 06/16/2010 10:04:15 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
His comment, the F4 was proof that if you put a big enough motor on a barn door, it will fly.

You'd hear endless variations on that theme, but the F-15 has the same engines and much less blocky profile. Once saw a -15 stand on it's tail a few hundred feet up and just hang there for all the F-4 folks to see.

32 posted on 06/16/2010 10:11:24 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Yea, without the external tanks, the flight time was not real long!


33 posted on 06/16/2010 10:12:04 AM PDT by LasVegasMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I was an air traffic controller in the AF and pretty much cut my teeth on the F-4. I can’t tell you how many F-4’s I worked using PAR (precision approach radar to the non-flying Freepers) in a freezing cold GCA (Ground Controlled Approach) van in Germany. About the hardest aircraft to get on course and keep him on course.


34 posted on 06/16/2010 10:26:53 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A classic, but a little too slow and cumbersome to take on the newest generation of CHICOM fighters.


35 posted on 06/16/2010 12:16:14 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP
Turn them into QF-4 drones, load them with JDAMs and send them north as high speed UCAVs.

That's way too practical and cost-efficient. The government will never go for it!

36 posted on 06/16/2010 12:18:25 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson