Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

and yet... if there was quick, decisive action taken ANY TIME within the first .. oh... 35 days... the damage would have been MUCH less severe.

the extent of the damage is directly related to the lack of proper executive action.


16 posted on 06/12/2010 12:00:30 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sten

It is criminal negligence on the part of the “executive.” If he had thrown everything we got and then some at the spill for mitigation...it would just be a horrible accident. But there is mounting evidence that, that was not done. In fact evidence is showing the exact opposite. He didn’t take the lead, and even now keeps trying to push that responsibility down the food chain. During a crisis you don’t do that and our environmental laws should be used to hold him accountable.


25 posted on 06/12/2010 5:19:24 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson