Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unseen1

“Jd has been part of DC since 1994. He has voted for trillions in spending. He was one of the biggest pork spenders in congress. “

WRONG. JD has NEVER been on the list of big porkbarrelers. You’re buying McCain’s crappola! Get some facts and stop helping McCain spread his lies.

Indians, Lobbyists and Arizona Politics...OH MY!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2440173/posts

McCain Received $100,000 From Firm Of Abramoff Notoriety

A review of campaign finance filings shows that the Arizona Republican has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from employees of Greenberg Traurig, the very firm where Abramoff once reigned.

And while the report pushed for greater transparency and accountability, towards the end, McCain and the other authors seemingly put the onus for change not on Congress itself, but on the tribes that Abramoff bilked.

Those donations include several thousand dollars from registered lobbyists who represent, or have represented, businesses such as NewsCorp, Rupert Murdoch’s media empire; Spi Spirits, a Cyprus based company that has fought with the Russian government for the rights to the Stolichnaya vodka brand name; El Paso Corp, a major energy company; General Motors; and the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a group of businesses and trade associations “concerned” about the shortage of lesser skilled and unskilled labor.

All told, McCain has received more than $400,000 from lobbying firms, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And among his major fundraisers (”bundlers”) 59 have been identified as lobbyists by the non-profit organization Public Citizen.

[snips] McCain portrays himself as a Washington maverick unswayed by special interests, referring recently to lobbyists as “birds of prey.” Yet in his current campaign, more than 40 fund-raisers and top advisers have lobbied or worked for an array of gambling interests - including tribal and Las Vegas casinos, lottery companies, and online poker purveyors.

When rules being considered by Congress threatened a California tribe’s planned casino in 2005, McCain helped spare the tribe. Its lobbyist, who had no prior experience in the gambling industry, had a nearly 20-year friendship with McCain.”

McCain has been chair of the Indian affairs committee since 2005, having served on it for many years prior. He used this position to bring down Abramoff, who was second only to handing out tribe dollars to McCain’s man Scott Reed. Some have speculated the move was not so much to rid politics of the likes of Abramoff, but to gain a monopoly on tribe campaign dollars. There’s even a book, ‘The Perfect Villain: John McCain and the Demonization of Jack Abramoff’ speculating McCain’s motives.

In one such article, Chuck Muth writes:

“When stories of Jack Abramoff taking various Indian tribes to the cleaners first hit the press, McCain - Chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee and author of the un-American, anti-free speech McCain-Feingold campaign censorship law - decided this would be an excellent opportunity to settle some old scores, help out some old pals, and do what Sen. McCain does best...get media attention for Sen. McCain.

As the Washington insider newspaper The Hill reported in March 2004, McCain wrote at least one letter on Senate letterhead praising Reed to one of Abramoff’s clients, the Saginaw Chippewa. Five days later, Abramoff was fired and the Saginaw Chippewa tribe retained Reed. In addition, columnist Bob Novak reported last December that on the eve of the investigation’s hearings, Reed handed some $200,000 in bundled contributions to McCain. Does this smell, or what?

The thing is, this McCain “investigation” looks like a real scandal in and of itself. If there are/were actual crimes involved, that’s what the Justice Department is for, not the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Instead, McCain appears to be using his committee and his position to (a) grandstand for his 2008 presidential campaign, (b) pay back conservatives who opposed him in 2000, and (c) scratch the back of a well-heeled lobbyist who is scratching right back. “

_______________

An interesting note. McCain, as head of Indian Affairs in congress, refused to work on any issues except Abramoff (not really that committee’s venue to start with) and has irritated many of the tribal people over this.

http://64.38.12.138/News/2005/010493.asp

top individual recipient of Indian gaming money during election 2000 was none other than anti-soft money crusader Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who sits on the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs.

_______________

John McCain, Indian Agent

I thought the days of Indian Agents deceptively crafting words to steal land and resulting in forced relocation were long gone, but now there’s a republican presidential candidate running sliming for the highest office in the land,who’s done just that. McCain introduced legislation (S1973-1 and S.1003) and claimed that legislation was justified by a non-existent range war between the Dineh and the Hopi.

http://www.nativeamericannetroots.net/diary/87/


439 posted on 06/12/2010 2:34:07 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]


To: AuntB
yes McCain is bad. saying McCain is bad does not mean that JD is good.

Among other Bush-era priorities, Hayworth supported and McCain opposed the 2003 Medicare prescription-drug benefit that is estimated to saddle taxpayers with between $8 trillion and $11 trillion in unfunded liabilities over 75 years.

Hayworth, who won six terms in the House before losing his seat to Democrat Harry Mitchell in 2006, counters that McCain is the real profligate spender.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/02/15/20100215bigspenders0215.html#ixzz0qg2sPTFr

To me they both suck. Jd is no Sharon angle or Nikki Haley.

In my book any “conservative” that could vote for medicare part D is akin to those that supported TARP. in fact medicare part D will cost about 8 times more than TARP in the long run.

If I lived in Az I would vote for neither on the ballot on primary day and rouse my self to vote for the winner of the contest against the dem. No matter their faults both McCain and JD would be better than any dem on the ticket. Because the dem leadership is controlled by Marxists thus the most conservative dem in Congress is going to vote for the Marxist plan.

Just like the biggest RINO in congress will vote for the conservative agenda if the GOP leadership were conservative.

My fight isn't about the AZ primary I DO NOT CARE WHO WINS. My fight is to get the most conservative candidate on the national scene to win the whitehouse. It would also be nice that when that person wins the WH she has loyal friends to help push her conservative agenda through the halls of congress.

440 posted on 06/12/2010 2:45:56 PM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson