[unseen1]

that is what McCain might support. It is not what Palin supports. McCain picked Palin has his VP because she wasn't him. he didn't someone that was not on the same page as he was.

You trying to equate the two is just plain stupid.

Palin has stated many times her endorsement does not mean she supports all the candidates positions. she simply feels they are the best conservative that can win.

McCain's endorsement is more about loyalty than anything else.

Your lack of logic and clear thinking is making your posts painful to read.

Palin does not equal McCain no matter how many times you say it. Her positions, causes, campaigning, and govenerinng style are completely different. they have some positions they agree on but not the ones you want to highlight (mostly their foreign policy views). Palin has never advocated anti 1st, or 2nd amendment positions, she has never wanted bigger government etc etc.

In fact your attempt to link the two is a childish thing to do when the facts do not support you. yet for some reason you continue to do so.

Who do you support? Is it Mitt or some other RINO?

[mkjessup]

Hey there Einstein, Sarah Palin is on the record as saying that she "shares John McCain's vision for America", and you ought to know that 'vision' is NOT a conservative one.

That makes Sarah Palin an 'inconsistent conservative' and no amount of spin is going to change that.

[Lakeshark]

Doughy one voted third party in 2008. I think he voted for Baldwin in 2008, but I'm not sure that's correct.

Is that right?

[DoughtyOne]

You don’t endorse someone you don’t agree with.

Palin has one degree of separation between the things McCain likes to do, and two degrees of separation between the people he like to do them with.

http://www.hotr.us/data/mccainagain.html

[DoughtyOne]

Oh my gosh..., “might support”?

It’s what he has done his whole life. What do you mean he might support it? He did it.