Saint Sarah [Newsweek's Full Bore Palin Attack]

Newsweek ^ | June 11, 2010 | Lisa Miller

[stephenjohnbanker]

” Duncan Hunter has forgotten more about national defense and military issues than most people could ever hope to know. He arrived in Washington in 1980 with the original Reagan Landslide, and if voters in the primary season of 2008 had the sense God gave them, they would have recognized that Hunter would have been the finest President since Reagan, but they were simply too stupid to understand it, and now the more infantile of the Palin groupies sneer about Hunter and make jokes about a man they’re not good enough to shine the shoes of. “

Sadly, this shows how far we have slipped as a nation.

[mkjessup]

...I handled my mistake like an adult. You have handled the response like a child. Do you think it represents Palin well to have child-like rude people mouthing off on her behalf on internet forums?

D1, if the topic of the original article had been Comrade Zero back in 2008, you would have already have been called a bigot, a racist, graphics of klansmen would have been posted, there would have been no end to it. The same thing happens when there is even one discordant voice on a thread where Sarah Palin is the topic. Anybody who isn't in lockstep with her groupies is a 'hater', a 'misogynist', 'can't handle strong women', blah-blah-blah, we've seen this time and time again from the Palin Rabid Response Team.

You made an error in posting. You apologized for it like the gentleman you are. Unfortunately that apology was seized upon by SOME (not all) posters like monkey sh*t is seized and flung by apes in a cage.

[DoughtyOne]

Look, I can only provide the documented information.

If you haven’t the tools to read it, understand it, and realize what it means, I can’t help you.

There are four pages of information there. And you refer to over 175 plus documented facts, as ‘one trick pony’.

But of course, over 175 leftist tricks pulled from within our ranks... no problem.

You out yourself more with every post. You are the poster child for the folks who support Palin and McCain.

Evidently I don’t want to do her anywhere near as much damage as you do.

[Czar]

Agree completely. Part of the problem, I think, was the lack of a comprehensive and robust campaign plan and the funding to implement it. Also a factor was our sixth column anti-American media which did everything possible to to ensure the voters heard very little about him.

Wouldn't we like to have him now...

[DoughtyOne]

Agreed. It’s the Democrat MO now being used by folks who say they are on our side. From the book Alynsky’s Rules for Conservatives, I suppose.

[mkjessup]

Man!...your gonna ride that one trick pony to its death!
I doubt God could pass your political test...

I doubt that you could pass a Rorschach test.

But you get partial credit for a screen name ('M-cubed') that at least alludes to your true nature:

You're an effin blockhead.

[mkjessup]

Agree completely. Part of the problem, I think, was the lack of a comprehensive and robust campaign plan and the funding to implement it. Also a factor was our sixth column anti-American media which did everything possible to to ensure the voters heard very little about him.

There was a deliberate and concerted effort to minimize Duncan Hunter not only by the lamestream media, but by the RINO controlled RNC, they were highly p*ssed off when Hunter coined a new campaign phrase 'the Kennedy wing of the Republican Party' and that, combined with that infamous attempt by Fox News to shut Hunter out of the South Carolina debate and basically censoring coverage of Hunter leading up to the New Hampshire primary pretty much put the kabosh on the Hunter campaign. There is more info on a public Facebook page titled 'Conservatives Against Fox News' that is worth the read:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=21811397344

Wouldn't we like to have him now...

"You betcha"

[unseen1]

that is what McCain might support. It is not what Palin supports. McCain picked Palin has his VP because she wasn't him. he didn't someone that was not on the same page as he was.

You trying to equate the two is just plain stupid.

Palin has stated many times her endorsement does not mean she supports all the candidates positions. she simply feels they are the best conservative that can win.

McCain's endorsement is more about loyalty than anything else.

Your lack of logic and clear thinking is making your posts painful to read.

Palin does not equal McCain no matter how many times you say it. Her positions, causes, campaigning, and govenerinng style are completely different. they have some positions they agree on but not the ones you want to highlight (mostly their foreign policy views). Palin has never advocated anti 1st, or 2nd amendment positions, she has never wanted bigger government etc etc.

In fact your attempt to link the two is a childish thing to do when the facts do not support you. yet for some reason you continue to do so.

Who do you support? Is it Mitt or some other RINO?

[mkjessup]

Hey there Einstein, Sarah Palin is on the record as saying that she "shares John McCain's vision for America", and you ought to know that 'vision' is NOT a conservative one.

That makes Sarah Palin an 'inconsistent conservative' and no amount of spin is going to change that.

[mkjessup]

Agreed. It’s the Democrat MO now being used by folks who say they are on our side. From the book Alynsky’s Rules for Conservatives, I suppose.

Ruh roh D1, you misspelled 'Alinsky' ("Alynsky"), I demand that you apologize so I can start calling you all sorts of names. ;)

[Lakeshark]

Doughy one voted third party in 2008. I think he voted for Baldwin in 2008, but I'm not sure that's correct.

Is that right?

[mkjessup]

Lakesnark the Dancing Monkey.

Why am I not suprised that you've arrived to start stinkin' up the thread again?

[Lakeshark]

I came to see how much y'all whined and cried last night after I went to sleep.

I wasn't much surprised. Y'all are so pathetic. Unhappy, angry and generally embarrasing yourselves as per usual.

Tell us mk, did you have an unhappy childhood? Did your wife leave you? Bankruptcy?

There has to be a reason you're so unhappy with your life.

[DoughtyOne]

You don’t endorse someone you don’t agree with.

Palin has one degree of separation between the things McCain likes to do, and two degrees of separation between the people he like to do them with.

http://www.hotr.us/data/mccainagain.html

[mkjessup]

Once again, classic projection on your part. I have a great life, and no complaints about my childhood. Never even had a coronary, but I’m sure you’ll find some imaginary tragedy to joke about, that’s the kind of low life you are.

Perhaps your own childhood spent living in the local muncipal kennel is why you tend to lash out like you do?

Who DoughtyOne voted for in 2008 is irrelevant to the discussion.

But that’s all you’re capable of, raising irrelevant and meaningless nonsense.

[DoughtyOne]

Oh my gosh..., “might support”?

It’s what he has done his whole life. What do you mean he might support it? He did it.

[unseen1]

Hey there dumbo unless you can explain what McCain's vision is and what she was sharing your point is moot.

a statement like that is typical political verbiage to show support with a person yet not detail what they are agreeing too or link themselves with the person's policies.

[DoughtyOne]

I am very sorry. LMAO

[DoughtyOne]

I have been more than frank about who I voted for in 2008.

So your guesses are rather pathetic at this point.

Sarah Palin is separated by one degree from these actions, and two degrees from those McCain chose to do them with.

http://www.hotr.us/data/mccainagain.html

[Lakeshark]

Actually, I was hoping to help you with your anger and misery, your posts are so filled with them, it seemd you needed some assistance.

If you have such a great life, why is that so?