Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virus infection may trigger unusual immune cells to attack nerves in multiple sclerosis
Physorg.com ^ | June 11. 2010 | Univeristy of Washington

Posted on 06/11/2010 8:43:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMind

A section of brain from a mouse with multiple sclerosis-like disease induced by viral infection. The fluorescently stained image shows a type of killer white blood cell, called CD8+ T cells (colored green), invading the brain and attracting other immune cells (red) that degrade the nerve protein myelin. Myelin forms a sheath around nerves. When the myelin sheath is damaged, the nerve is like a frayed electrical cord that no longer transmits correctly.

A virus infection can incite the body to attack its own nerve tissue by activating unusual, disease-fighting cells with receptors for both viral and nerve proteins. The dual-receptor observation suggests a way brain and spinal cord nerve damage might be triggered in susceptible young adults afflicted with multiple sclerosis (MS).

University of Washington Department of Immunology scientists Qingyong "John" Ji, Antoine Perchellet, and Joan M. Goverman conducted the study, which was published June 6 in Nature Immunology.

This is thought to be the first study to reveal a mechanism for autoimmune disease that depends on destroyer immune cells expressing dual receptors for a normal protein made by the body and a pathogen.

Multiple sclerosis is one of many autoimmune disorders in which the body's lines of defense become misguided and start damaging normal tissue. In the case of multiple sclerosis, the protective sheath around major nerves -- the myelin -- in the brain and spinal cord disintegrates. Like a frayed electrical cord, the nerves no longer transmit a clear signal.

People with multiple sclerosis might lose their ability to see, walk, or use their arms, depending on which nerves are affected. The symptoms can appear, disappear, and re-appear. The disease is more common in women than in men.

In healthy people, the immune system is kept in check to tolerate the usual proteins and cells in the body, much like an eager watch dog is put on a leash and trained to ignore friends and neighbors, yet still protect the family.

"Autoimmunity is believed to arise from an accidental breakdown in this tolerance of the body's own proteins. This breakdown is triggered by something in the environment, most likely a pathogen," noted Goverman, professor and acting chair of immunology whose research concentrates on the origins of autoimmune disease. Her lab is studying mechanisms that maintain tolerance, as well as the "tripping" mechanisms that defeat it.

In their most recently published study, her research team genetically engineered mice that over-produce a certain type of white blood cell from a group known as killer T cells. The normal function of killer cells is to attack tumor cells or cells infected with viruses or other pathogens. These T cells have receptors that recognize specific proteins that infected cells display to them, much like holding up a target in a window.

The specific killer T cells examined in this study were CD8+ T cells. The Goverman lab engineered mice to over-produce CD8+cells that recognized myelin basic protein, a predominant protein in the myelin sheath that covers nerves. The major question investigated in the study was whether the genetically engineered mice would exhibit a disease that resembled multiple sclerosis.

The researchers infected the mice with a virus that has itself been engineered to produce myelin basic protein. This infection should activate the CD8+T cells to first attack the virally infected cells making myelin basic protein to eliminate the virus, then kill other cells that make myelin basic protein to wrap around nerves. Killing those cells would destroy the myelin sheath.

As expected, the mice developed a multiple sclerosis-like disease. But the researchers were surprised when viruses lacking the myelin basic protein also triggered the disease.

Additional cross-breeding experiments revealed the existence of two receptors on a few of the CD8+T cells. These cells, engineered specifically to bind to myelin basic protein, also built their own receptors for viruses, and could recognize both. When exposed to cells infected with viruses, they would bind to and destroy them using one receptor. Geared up as if they were beserk, some of these double-agent cells then would head elsewhere to bind their other receptor to cells producing myelin basic protein and ruin the coats on nerve cells.

"These results," the authors noted, "demonstrate a role for dual-receptor cells in autoimmunity." The study also points to why a ubiquitous viral infection could leave most people without any lasting effects, but trigger autoimmunity in genetically predisposed individuals.

The findings open a new perspective on the proposal that multiple sclerosis is virally induced, despite the inability to detect infectious virus in the central nervous system of multiple sclerosis patients. Data from other studies show that CD8+T cells can cross the blood-brain barrier, and also that multiple sclerosis patients have more central nervous system protein-specific CD8+T cells, compared to healthy people.

In the dual-receptor model, the autoimmune activity against nerve protein can continue after the virus is wiped out. Multiple sclerosis patients usually have high levels of antibodies indicating past infectious from several common viruses, but a live virus associated with multiple sclerosis has not been consistently observed. Therefore, to date, no specific virus has been confirmed as a causative agent for multiple sclerosis.

The authors explained that it's possible that multiple viruses could influence susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. The ability of any particular virus to contribute to the disease could depend on an individual's own repertoire of other predisposing genes, exposure to other predisposing environmental factors, and the random chance that T cells had been generated that recognize a myelin protein and a pathogen.

Receptors on T cells are randomly generated during their development. This observation helps explain why multiple sclerosis is partly a matter of chance. Some people with a genetic predisposition and environmental exposure develop the disease, while others with similar genetic predisposition and environmental exposure do not.

It's uncertain how common these dual-receptor T cells are, according to the researchers, although there are reports that up to one-third of human T cells express dual receptors. Goverman and her group plan to test samples from multiple sclerosis patients and see how many have dual-receptor T-cells.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: ms; tcell; virus
In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses.
1 posted on 06/11/2010 8:43:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind; cgk; rdb3

MS Bump


2 posted on 06/11/2010 8:47:37 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

It also talks about exposure to multiple viruses perhaps causing a greater chance to develop MS.

The article notes that MS patients have evidence of exposure to multiple viruses - more than normal.

Is so, what is the effect of flu shots? Are not flu shots an inactive form of a virus that the body’s immune system is then trained to attack?

Might this not then increase the risk of MS?


3 posted on 06/11/2010 9:34:08 AM PDT by NorthernTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses.

Or rather, that some T-cells have two sets of different receptors, one which happens to fit the virus and the other that happens to fit the protein conformation of myelin sheath cells. I studied immunology a while back and had never heard of dual-receptor T-cells. Makes them much more complex to study and understand.

4 posted on 06/11/2010 9:34:36 AM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Wouldn’t you think that there is no reason for a virus to ever be there if the T-cell has as its second receptor something that has always fit myelin? It sounds like the whole virus thing is irrelevant as apparently that molded receptor isn’t the problem and never was.


5 posted on 06/11/2010 9:44:57 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Interesting. Thanks for the bump.


6 posted on 06/11/2010 10:00:19 AM PDT by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart. My heart is ripped, RIP Bahbah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Wouldn’t you think that there is no reason for a virus to ever be there if the T-cell has as its second receptor something that has always fit myelin? It sounds like the whole virus thing is irrelevant as apparently that molded receptor isn’t the problem and never was.

Good point, but the T-cell is a potent weapon and needs to be activated in several ways, only one of which is the attachment to the corresponding antigen. There is usually a secondary stimulus to fully activate the cell (auxiliary cell or cytocines). If T-cells were too easily activated then the possibility of autoimmune responses would be very high. I'm guessing here that the virus initiates the T-cell response by bonding to the viral T-cell receptor; once activated these dual-receptor T-cells then proliferate and eventually bind to myelin with their other receptor. I don't yet really understand the dual-receptor concept. It would to make these T-cells somewhat dangerous.

7 posted on 06/11/2010 1:15:14 PM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson