Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses.
1 posted on 06/11/2010 8:43:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind; cgk; rdb3

MS Bump


2 posted on 06/11/2010 8:47:37 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

It also talks about exposure to multiple viruses perhaps causing a greater chance to develop MS.

The article notes that MS patients have evidence of exposure to multiple viruses - more than normal.

Is so, what is the effect of flu shots? Are not flu shots an inactive form of a virus that the body’s immune system is then trained to attack?

Might this not then increase the risk of MS?


3 posted on 06/11/2010 9:34:08 AM PDT by NorthernTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind
In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses.

Or rather, that some T-cells have two sets of different receptors, one which happens to fit the virus and the other that happens to fit the protein conformation of myelin sheath cells. I studied immunology a while back and had never heard of dual-receptor T-cells. Makes them much more complex to study and understand.

4 posted on 06/11/2010 9:34:36 AM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson