In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses.
To: ConservativeMind; cgk; rdb3
2 posted on
06/11/2010 8:47:37 AM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: ConservativeMind
It also talks about exposure to multiple viruses perhaps causing a greater chance to develop MS.
The article notes that MS patients have evidence of exposure to multiple viruses - more than normal.
Is so, what is the effect of flu shots? Are not flu shots an inactive form of a virus that the body’s immune system is then trained to attack?
Might this not then increase the risk of MS?
To: ConservativeMind
In short, there appears to be no virus that is directly responsible, but, in fact, it is a type of T-cell that, once molded to fit a new virus, then finds this receptor also fits on nerve myelin, effectively identifying them as viruses. Or rather, that some T-cells have two sets of different receptors, one which happens to fit the virus and the other that happens to fit the protein conformation of myelin sheath cells. I studied immunology a while back and had never heard of dual-receptor T-cells. Makes them much more complex to study and understand.
4 posted on
06/11/2010 9:34:36 AM PDT by
Blennos
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson