Posted on 06/10/2010 11:38:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
When Sarah Palin, in a rambling lakeside announcement last July in Wasilla, said she was quitting as governor of Alaska because of the abuse she and her family were taking from petty politicians and a feral press, she was written off as dead by the pundits.
"A quitter, can't take the heat," was the Beltway consensus.
Yet, it seems that was no more the end of Sarah than it was the end of Richard Nixon when, after losing to Gov. Pat Brown in California in 1962, he spat at the press: "Just think how much you're going to be missing. You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference."
Six years later, Nixon took the oath on the Capitol steps.
And though the media have painted Palin as a ditz, no politician in memory has conducted a more brilliant pre-presidential campaign, if that is what she is about, than the lady who calls herself "the Mama Grizzly."
Consider Tuesday. Palin had gambled big by going into South Carolina to endorse Nikki Haley, a state legislator running last for the GOP nomination for governor -- against the lieutenant governor, the attorney general and a congressman.
Haley instantly vaulted into the lead, taking 49 percent on primary day, and is headed for the governor's mansion -- in a Palmetto State that holds what is often the decisive primary in presidential nomination runs.
Nikki was Sarah's kind of conservative with a populist touch.
But Terry Branstad is not. This ex-governor of Iowa, who served four terms ending in 1998, is a moderate. Yet Palin endorsed him in his comeback bid over a conservative backed by Dr. James Dobson and Mike Huckabee.
After his victory Tuesday, Branstad, too, is headed for the governor's mansion in a state that hosts the first big battle of 2012 -- the Iowa caucuses.
By bringing conservatives to Branstad's camp, Palin can claim some credit for returning him to office, though Mitt Romney backed Branstad earlier and his and Branstad's staffs are said to be wired.
The endorsement of Branstad suggests Palin, a politician of principle, has a pragmatic streak. She acts not only out of instinct but cold calculation. How else to explain the Branstad endorsement over a social conservative than a decision to befriend a future GOP governor in the first battleground state of 2012?
Other interventions this cycle reveal Palin to be far more savvy than the caricature drawn by the left.
Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, a colleague of Palin's in the GOP Governor's Association, was facing an uphill battle against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who had the backing of Dick Cheney -- Mr. National Security and the most visible national Republican of 2009.
Cheney went to Texas for Hutchison. Palin went in for Perry, who had scrambled to the Tea Party right, even raising the specter of secession. Perry won in a walk. Palin 1, Cheney 0.
Perry will lead the second-largest bloc of delegates to the GOP convention in Tampa, Fla. The largest will come from California, where Carly Fiorina -- another one of Palin's mama grizzlies -- won the GOP Senate nod on Tuesday. Palin had endorsed her over the more conservative Chuck DeVore.
In Kentucky, where the establishment backed Mitch McConnell's handpicked successor to Sen. Jim Bunning, Trey Grayson, and Cheney went in for Grayson, Palin endorsed Rand Paul, son of Ron Paul, who has a loyal libertarian following.
With Palin and Tea Party backing, Rand won. The Pauls, too, owe a debt to Sarah. Palin 2, Cheney 0.
In Arizona, Palin, who is closer in her politics to J.D. Hayworth, came to campaign for embattled Sen. John McCain, who chose her as his running mate and made her a star.
McCain's aides have been anonymously trashing Sarah as an airhead who had caused the ticket's defeat. She repaid their disloyalty with unqualified loyalty to McCain, who is unlikely to forget what she did, at some cost to herself.
But it was Sarah's first intervention, in New York's 23rd Congressional District, where she showed a boldness that marks the better politicians.
Liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava was handpicked by the party to face Democrat Bill Owens in the Republican district. Doug Hoffman, endorsed by the Conservative Party, jumped in. Newt Gingrich urged Republicans to stand by the pro-choice, pro-gay-rights Scozzafava.
Palin went rogue and declared for Hoffman, who surged past Scozzafava, who fell to third, bowed out and endorsed Owens, who won by two. That was the first manifestation of Palin Power. Palin 1, Newt 0.
Looking over Palin's endorsements -- McCain over J.D., Fiorina over DeVore, Branstad over Bob Vander Plaats and Rod Roberts -- the lady is not running for Mrs. Conservative. The one explanation that makes the most sense of all the seeming inconsistencies in endorsements is that Mama Grizzly is thinking about moving the Wasilla brood into the big house.
And I do not respect her for quiting...
This is America. I would not personally choose this time and place to declare myself an idiot, but you are free to do so.
“I’m not quitting. I’m reloading.”
I hate that McCain is the beneficiary of her loyalty, but that does not impact on my admiration for Sarah and her energy and strength of character.
***************
Me too, but think how rich i will be if Senator McCain is compelled to defer to Madame President Palin.
how rich IT will be if Senator McCain is compelled to defer to Madame President Palin.
I've been thinking about that.
It would look very bad for her if she didn't support McCain...kinda like how Algore looked when he didn't endorse Joe Lieberman for prez in 2004. Petty.
I've recognized for awhile that her endorsements and support position her perfectly for a run in 2012. I don't know whether she will or not.
She's done so by helping the Haleys, etc. I just realized that helping McCain is a part of that...a message to other politicians that she's loyal, and won't pull the rug from under their feet when politically expedient.
That has incredible value, especially to women politicians...and voters.
Yes, some of us have been saying since she resigned that she probably "quit" to run a "pre-presidential campaign".
People are starting to catch on now including Pat Buchanan.
Embarrassingly, a glance at a couple threads even here at FR shows that there are still a few people who are stuck on...not seeing it.
It's me too.
I would also add that performing a Pre Presidential Run while serving a term is not an ethical thing to do while resigning an office to make such a run, is.
I'd say it's more a case that her endorsements and support position the American political landscape closer to traditional American values. That also happens to support her for a run in 2012, but I don't think manipulation is the primary purpose of her actions today. My guess is that she would rather stay active in the political wings where she has more time and more privacy, if she could avoid running, and she'd love to see a strong conservative leader emerge and then beat Obama in 2012. Unfortunately for her, and I suspect against her wishes, she's still (at least for now) the best choice for that role.
yes it seems she took good notes on what and how Reagan did what he did
yes it seems she took good notes on what and how Reagan did what he did
IMO no matter which person wins in AZ conservatives win. McCain was forced to move right and in that light primary elections are a good thing.
Be it POTUS, Leader of a movement, etc. She is setting herself up to be able to capitalize on every opportunity.
She is becoming the heart and soul of the Conservative movement, just as Ronald Magnus Reagan was, and before that Nixon, Taft, and Teddy Roosevelt. Whether she will run and win is uncertain, imo.
But here is a big MAMA GRIZZLY PING!
(Compared to Sarah, all others are just cub scouts)
I couldn't resist posting this one too!
And btw, make that Teddy Roosevelt, Taft, GOLDWATER, Nixon, and Reagan. Nixon was no Conservative.
People don't understand Palin because she thinks differently than other politicians. The typical Mitt buttboy politician would at this point decide he was going to run for POTUS and then do everything directed at that one goal.
Palin on the other hand made the decision she would run IF the opportunity present itself and has done everything in her power to ensure that opportunity comes about.
One is focused and directed on one goal. The other is doing plans within plans within plans and no matter how it falls out Palin will have many options to choose from.
Never seen a politician who works a crowd better than she does.
She may end up with all the chips on the table (ie. POTUS), but she is already a big winner, with more influence in the Republican Party than anyone. Not to mention the millions she has made honestly, writing books and giving speeches.
If not POTUS, then certainly some position of great influence. Someone mentioned Secretary of the Interior, and I would love to have her in that office.
He is kinda the George Will of NBC, Will really can not be trusted either, though he is often right, and is also the token Conservative for ABC for how many years?? He is also there for a reason.
This quote from the article.....
She repaid their disloyalty with unqualified loyalty to McCain, who is unlikely to forget what she did, at some cost to herself.
I can see McCain elected and trashing Sarah in 2012, hope I am wrong, but I can see it now...McCain is asked the Palin question, is she ready to be President and will you support/endorse her, McCain will say?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.