Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USA Fielding M110 7.62mm Semi-Auto Sniper Rifle
Defense Industry Daily ^ | 6/9/2010 | Defense Industry Daily

Posted on 06/09/2010 9:10:58 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

In this war, snipers matter in close-quarters urban fights. So does penetrating power. Accurate ranged lethality is equally important for squads in open areas, where engagement distances can easily make 5.56mm rounds ineffective. Bolt-action sniper rifles solve these problems, but can get your best people killed in close-up automatic firefights. Semi-automatic weapons have traditionally been less reliable and accurate, but offer the only reasonable approach that covers both extremes.

The result has been the emergence of a hybrid approach, on both a people level and a technical level. On the human end, militaries like the Americans and British are adopting “designated marksman” or “sharpshooter” roles in normal infantry squads, who aren’t full snipers but do have additional training and qualification. On the technical side, gun makers are fielding semi-automatic systems that offer nearly bolt-action accuracy out to 800-1000 meters, but can also be used in closer-quarters firefights. The British have hurried the L129A1 to their infantry squad sharpshooters, but the Americans have a longer running program, which is beginning to ramp up production and fielding…

The M110 is intended to replace the M24 Sniper Weapon System used by snipers, spotters, designated marksman, or squad advanced marksmen in the US Army. In 2006, the Army projected total buy of 4,492 systems. M24 orders continued into early 2010, however, and it seems likely that both will serve together for a few years.

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseindustrydaily.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 762mm; banglist; m110; rifle; sharpshooter; sniper; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2010 9:10:58 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I’ve heard this all my life—that bolt action was more accurate than semi-auto—but no one can really explain to me why. Is it just a “thing” people just parrot—because that’s what they’ve always heard too—without any proof?


2 posted on 06/09/2010 9:13:05 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Basically an M-16 in 7.62 NATO caliber.


3 posted on 06/09/2010 9:14:23 PM PDT by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

H’mmmm, I wonder if it will have the range of the old M110 175mm gun?


4 posted on 06/09/2010 9:14:49 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

The answer: An automatic revolver

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_revolver


5 posted on 06/09/2010 9:14:54 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

6 posted on 06/09/2010 9:15:11 PM PDT by umgud (Obama is a failed experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

you can generally get a more consistent “weld” between the barrel and the forearm with a bolt gun. Bolt guns allow you to use “neck sized” ammo which is also much more accurate.


7 posted on 06/09/2010 9:16:46 PM PDT by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

The M14 is still doing the job. I have a Springfield Armory M1A National Match in my defensive arsenal with an ART IV scope.


8 posted on 06/09/2010 9:18:43 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

They are awesome.


9 posted on 06/09/2010 9:20:31 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Someone should invent a weapon like this . Maybe call it the M-14 .


10 posted on 06/09/2010 9:20:55 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Sorry, but if they’re going for 800-1000 yd hits, they need more than a 10-magnification on that 110. I certainly want one of those. Anyone know if there is a civilian version yet?


11 posted on 06/09/2010 9:20:58 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roklok

“Basically an M-16 in 7.62 NATO caliber.”

I believe that would be 5.56 mm NATO.


12 posted on 06/09/2010 9:21:17 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC one

OK, thanks!


13 posted on 06/09/2010 9:24:34 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

I believe with a bolt action you seat can the cartridge tighter—the tolerances are necessarily greater when you are mechanically trying to blow out the shell after each firing as with a semi-auto.

At least that’s what makes sense to me. A bolt is a much simpler and cleaner design and since speed of extraction is not an issue....you have the ability to have much tighter tolerances, which equals more accuracy.


14 posted on 06/09/2010 9:26:16 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

15 posted on 06/09/2010 9:28:24 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Liberals are right. The AZ situation is like Nazi Germany. Mexico is Germany and Arizona is Poland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

Well, what you say does make sense...maybe that’s it after all.


16 posted on 06/09/2010 9:31:02 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
I’ve heard this all my life—that bolt action was more accurate than semi-auto—but no one can really explain to me why. Is it just a “thing” people just parrot—because that’s what they’ve always heard too—without any proof?

As I've always understood it, a semi-auto has more moving parts. Each of these parts moves in multiple directions, some directions are primary movement while some are just due to mechanical tolerances. With each moving part comes variability and variability is the enemy of accuracy.

The end effect of all this variability is that each round tends to seat ever so slightly differently from the previous round. Head spacing will be slightly different. Gas pressures will be slightly different which results in slightly different functioning of the action. When fired, the firing pin doesn't strike the primer dead on either.

These points of variability and others tend to adversely effect the accuracy of a semi-auto more than that of a simpler bolt action rifle.

17 posted on 06/09/2010 9:38:44 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

7.62 is simply metric for 30 caliber... and the 7.62 X 51mm cartridge here is just slightly smaller than the 7.62 x 54 which was the Soviet rifle round up through WWII. Of course the 7.62x54 was very similar in power to our standard 30.06 cartridge of the time used in the M1 Garand.

After 50 years of pushing the smaller 5.56mm X 45mm M16 cartridge is the brass FINALLY admitting it is too small???


18 posted on 06/09/2010 9:38:52 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
Exactly. Someone please tell me why we're spending $???,???,??? on a new 7.62mm semi-auto sniper rifle when there are already thousands of M-14s in storage, which could be refurbished for a fraction of the cost (probably) of the gussied-up AR-10? Save come money, fit them with new barrels, stocks, bipods, optics, etc., and go out and kill some scumbags.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

19 posted on 06/09/2010 9:38:54 PM PDT by wku man (Who says conservatives don't rock? Go to www.myspace.com/rockfromtheright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Thanks!


20 posted on 06/09/2010 9:49:00 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson