Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

I live in AZ and the original idea was that the media would report on the candidates and that would remove the need for a lot of money in the campaigns. Well, what happens is that the media ignores the conservative candidate and there is no way for the conservative to get the message out. That’s what happened with Gov. Janet Incompetano’s re-election when challenged by conservative Len Munsil. Munsil was the better candidate and the media ignored him in the general election. Any money he raised, the state would match it and give it to Napolitano. Absolutely no competition. Clean elections is the the exact opposite of its name and should be brought down for all the reasons including constitutional conflicts. It favors liberal incumbents.


12 posted on 06/09/2010 12:19:46 AM PDT by Bizhvywt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bizhvywt

I lived in AZ for many years. I am back in TN now.

AZ had what they needed when I was there. It was prosperous. What killed them was the immigration. Arizona is all grown-up and can figure out their problem. The liberals in AZ are completely wrong and cannot cite a single place where it has worked. They can cite Cali, or Oregon, or Washington. Looks like its total fail.


13 posted on 06/09/2010 12:29:18 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Bizhvywt

It encourages vote-splitter candidates like Richard Ma[p]hony, too.


15 posted on 06/09/2010 2:13:45 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Darwinism is to Genesis as Global Warming is to Revelations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson