[GlockThe Vote]

Let me ask this question for a 5th time, if not Sarah who?

Mitt?
Huck?
Newt?
Rudy?
Tancredo?
Hunter?
Paul?

[mkjessup]

Let me ask this question for a 5th time, if not Sarah who?
Mitt?
Huck?
Newt?
Rudy?
Tancredo?
Hunter?
Paul?

Your 'question' is a trick question, because you already have quick retorts as to why any of the above names you're mentioning are undesirable and/or unelectable. Other candidates are not the issue. The issue is Sarah Palin's conservative credentials which have become highly suspect due to her inconsistency as a conservative. By her own admission, she "shares John McCain's vision for America", and anyone who doesn't understand what that means doesn't have enough neurons to tie their shoes.

John McCain is NO conservative, there is no question, no argument about that.

Sarah Palin has stated clearly that she shares the "vision" of McCain for America, and as painful as it must be for the Palin-lovers out there, that equates only to one conclusion:

Sarah Palin's vision for America (which is the same as McCain's) is NOT a conservative vision.

[DoughtyOne]

For a guy that wants to be taken seriously, you sure don’t evidence a single clue that you realize the candidates won’t even declare for another fifteen months.

Why should any of us waste our time with such nonsensical tactics, demanding we name our preferred candidate now?

Are you writing this from study hall?