Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

” Hahha! I heard the professors debate about Committee on Style during the Clinton impeachment hearing. That was painful. Professor McDonald blew them out of the water. The transcripts I find on it fail to do him justice.”

I’m sorry I missed it.


141 posted on 06/10/2010 7:18:20 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker

The gist of McDonald’s remarks were simple — the Committee Of Style was painted by Lawrence Tribe, Alan Dershowitz [sic], and others as meaningless, that the words prior to Style had greater meaning. So the Constitution we look lack is not as important as an earlier draft.

But according to McDonald, the Committee Of Style was not just flowery poets. They helped refine the wording, and all of their changes had to be approved.


143 posted on 06/10/2010 7:27:31 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Kagan ENDED Constitutional Law in Harvard: freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2523089/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson