Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU warns Neb. city of legal action ahead of vote
Sioux City Journal ^ | June 6, 2010 | AP

Posted on 06/06/2010 7:34:08 AM PDT by mdittmar

FREMONT, Neb. (AP) — Legal action may be taken should Fremont voters approve rules cracking down on illegal immigrants, the American Civil Liberties Union warned Friday.

ACLU Nebraska leaders said they're hopeful voters will reject the proposal that bans hiring or renting to illegal immigrants on June 21.

But if they don't, an immediate injunction will likely be sought, said Laurel Marsh, executive director of ACLU Nebraska.

"We are hopeful that the voters will reject this pointless initiative," said the group's legal director, Amy Miller. "The law is crystal clear. Only the federal government can make laws about immigration. States and towns are out of line when they enter this area."

Under the proposal set for a June 21 vote, renters would have to get a license from the city. Afterward, city officials would be required to check a database to see if renters were in the country legally.

The ordinance also would require employers to check workers against the federal E-Verify database to see if they were in the country legally.

Kansas City, Mo.-based attorney Kris Kobach, who's been hired to represent the Fremont residents who sought the vote, said the ACLU's reaction was expected.

"They will quite often threaten communities with legal action," he said. "Sometimes they follow through with legal action, but rarely do they actually prevail."

Fremont is among a handful of Nebraska cities that have seen marked demographic changes primarily because of an influx of Hispanic workers at meatpacking plants. Illegal immigration has stirred strong opinions in the community of 25,000.

Supporters of the proposal say it's needed to make up for what they see as lax enforcement by federal officials.

Opponents say it could fuel discrimination.

The City Council had considered a policy similar to the proposed ordinance in 2008 and narrowly rejected it. But proponents collected enough signatures to put it on track to a public vote.

In April, the Nebraska Supreme Court said it wouldn't bar the election.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: aclu; american5thcolumn; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; snivellibertiesunion; threats; voterintimidation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 06/06/2010 7:34:09 AM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

This would get me standing on street corners with signs supporting this bill.


2 posted on 06/06/2010 7:35:40 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Warns = threaten.....next the libtard ACLU will hire SEIU thugs to prevent such votings from taking place.....


3 posted on 06/06/2010 7:35:53 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Illegal immigration is a civil right???


4 posted on 06/06/2010 7:36:00 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Argue from the Constitution: Initialpoints.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

What is with these people? This is not, and never has been, about “race” or “civil rights” - it’s about law, and, fairness to LEGAL residents. Illegal immigrants pull down wages, take jobs that Americans WOULD do if they were available to them (esp. with 10% unemployment) and paid more, and they’d pay more if there weren’t a bunch of illegals there willing to do them for $3.00 an hour under the table.


5 posted on 06/06/2010 7:38:43 AM PDT by RockinRight (I can see November from here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
But if they don't, an immediate injunction will likely be sought, said Laurel Marsh, executive director of ACLU Nebraska.

Aiding and abetting...

6 posted on 06/06/2010 7:39:23 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Illegal immigration is a civil right???

Yes!!! to Marxist treasonous scum ACLU it is....that is a given. they need to be tarred and feathered and run out of the country on a rail....

7 posted on 06/06/2010 7:40:03 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Sounds like the ACLU’s threat is Voter - Intimidation
8 posted on 06/06/2010 7:41:39 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
To the good people of Fremont...Don't take their $^*- without a fight!


9 posted on 06/06/2010 7:42:22 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The ACLU is a left wing hate group.


10 posted on 06/06/2010 7:42:34 AM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

“Illegal” is now synonymous with “legal.”


11 posted on 06/06/2010 7:43:16 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Opponents say it could fuel discrimination.

Good!!! It's time someone starting discriminating against illegal aliens!

12 posted on 06/06/2010 7:47:59 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I can say what should be done with the ACLU, but let’s keep the conversation bloodless.


13 posted on 06/06/2010 7:49:08 AM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Banning hiring of illegals is legally fine, because of eVerify. That is, it gives a means to employers to determine if someone is legal or illegal, and they are not liable if the system gets it wrong, which happens. All eVerify can do is determine if ID is legal, not if the person using it is legal.

The problem with the law is in the banning of renting to illegals part, because there is no way for someone who rents to determine if identification is sufficient to make the lease legal. That is, they have no access to eVerify. And if they guess wrong, they can get fined.

There is just no way this can stand up in court, and whoever proposed it probably knows that. Similar laws have already been thrown out elsewhere.

eVerify is totally controlled by the federal government. It *could* be changed to make it accessible to those who rent property, but it won’t be.


14 posted on 06/06/2010 7:58:20 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The Tea Party needs some effective means of standing up the these ACLU threats.

Perhaps we could sue for false advertising?

They are not American.
They are not Civil.
They protect no Liberties.


15 posted on 06/06/2010 7:58:43 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

“We are hopeful that the voters will reject this pointless initiative,” said the group’s legal director, Amy Miller. “The law is crystal clear. Only the federal government can make laws about immigration. States and towns are out of line when they enter this area.”

Except when the Federal government selectively ignores Federal law. Then, it’s time to reassert States’ Rights.

Bully for Nebraska. And, the ACLU can go pound sand.


16 posted on 06/06/2010 8:01:46 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
"said Laurel Marsh, executive director of ACLU Nebraska."We are hopeful that the voters will reject this pointless initiative," "

If it's "pointless", then why the injunction?
17 posted on 06/06/2010 8:05:03 AM PDT by FrankR (Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

If Amy is dead, can she still intimidate?


18 posted on 06/06/2010 8:08:15 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
It's already a federal crime to knowingly hire an illegal,isn't it? If true...what's the problem????

Ooops...forgot....ACLU.Founded by proud,unapologetic Marxists.And staffed by same to this very day.

19 posted on 06/06/2010 8:12:41 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Step #1 for the new Republican House and Senate next January:

DEFUND THE ACLU

Let them beg on street corners like all the other bums.

20 posted on 06/06/2010 8:15:32 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson