Current poll results ...
Yes - 86.4%
No - 13.6%
(Results not scientific)
87% YES
13% NO
Yes.
Yes and no. If you’re referring to burqas and other items that hide your face or identity, then yes. But if you’r referring to something like a Sikh turban, then no.
Why even have a photo if they burqa-up. It’s pathetic^insane.
The question should have been “...religious clothing that covers their head/identity...”, since identity is the whole point of the picture. Then it would be even more than the 89.9 that it already is.
There is a difference between the burka and mormon holy underwear.
Perhaps Fox should hire less crack heads.
The dispute, viewed honestly is over clothing that obscures the head and face, with no exemption for religion.
Not over all religious garb.
I have no use for idiot leftists who try to restate the old “Have you stopped beating your wife?” meme and think its cute.
Are you kidding?! They made me move my hair away from my face when I renewed my license! BTTT
The question is poorly written. There are many obvious alternate answers.
The question should add...if it obscures the person’s image. The way it is written, I can’t answer it.
Changed my mind. I voted.
Trick question in a false poll.
The case in point is that of a mooslim female who felt her rights were violated because she was asked to remove her scarf for the required picture to obtain a drivers license.
Mooslim females aren’t allowed to drive! It’s in their rules, look it up. Besides that, they’re property and aren’t allowed to talk either! She should have had the sharia police called on her the minute she walked into the DMV! Splash some acid on that bitch she’s done! I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you! There!
Sheesh, come on people! Next!
Yeah, any article that obscures a person’s identity, religious or not.
No, send the ragheads back to their sand box.
Just don’t give them licenses...it will be harder for them to drive explosives to a location!!!