To: avacado
All a matter of definitions I guess.
He claimed at the time that he was fighting for amnesty during the Bush years that it wasn’t amnesty.
I have a lib-in-law that claims she (and all democrats) are not socialists - “socialism’s what they had in the Soviet Union, that’s not what democrats want”.
14 posted on
06/03/2010 8:44:52 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
THE AMOUNT OF AIR-HEADEDNESS on the part of traitorous liberal idiots is incredible.
Most of their marbles have fallen out . . . if they ever had any to begin with.
20 posted on
06/03/2010 8:50:46 AM PDT by
Quix
(THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: MrB
I have a lib-in-law that claims she (and all democrats) are not socialists - “socialism’s what they had in the Soviet Union, that’s not what democrats want”. This is what Lenin meant when he coined the term "useful idiots".
33 posted on
06/03/2010 9:51:54 AM PDT by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson