Let's cut to the chase: 4 shots at close range to the head and one to the chest sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded, than an indication of "good shooting."
Yeah, this reply shows the depth of your intelligence.
BS, sounds like he was in the way of an automatic weapon.
Four shots to the head and one to the chest sounds like automatic fire.
The other 10 or 15 bullets missed.
How big is an Uzi clip anyway?
Maybe not. We have no idea where in the head and chest this young man was shot. This easily could have been the result of a shooter firing on full-auto at close range. Barrel travel while shooting on full-auto could explain the four in the chest and the one in the head.
Also, multiple shooters engaged on a single target could also easily explain the number of wounds.
What's less likely? While engaging a hoard of angry vigilantes, the IDF takes the time to shoot wounded on the ground. It's just not very plausible, given the scenario.
Again, good shooting.
Um...
ok...
No, actually four to the head and one in the chest sounds like he was targeted by two or three different soldiers at the same time. Someone went center mass while the others went for the headshot.
Not that it matters though, the end result is still a dead terrorist so what do I care how many people got an assist on this one?
“Let’s cut to the chase: 4 shots at close range to the head and one to the chest sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded, than an indication of “good shooting.””
Who cares. I could only be more happy if he was gut shot and died in agony — he’s a terrorist and deserved to die.
Let this be a lesson to other terrorists.