Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
Wow. There's an awful lot of FReeper stupidity on display on this thread.

Let's cut to the chase: 4 shots at close range to the head and one to the chest sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded, than an indication of "good shooting."

50 posted on 06/03/2010 8:11:15 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
There's an awful lot of FReeper stupidity on display on this thread.

Yeah, this reply shows the depth of your intelligence.

56 posted on 06/03/2010 8:14:16 AM PDT by softwarecreator (I want my greenshoots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

BS, sounds like he was in the way of an automatic weapon.


65 posted on 06/03/2010 8:18:35 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

Four shots to the head and one to the chest sounds like automatic fire.

The other 10 or 15 bullets missed.

How big is an Uzi clip anyway?


66 posted on 06/03/2010 8:21:30 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
"Let's cut to the chase: 4 shots at close range to the head and one to the chest sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded, than an indication of "good shooting." "

Maybe not. We have no idea where in the head and chest this young man was shot. This easily could have been the result of a shooter firing on full-auto at close range. Barrel travel while shooting on full-auto could explain the four in the chest and the one in the head.

Also, multiple shooters engaged on a single target could also easily explain the number of wounds.

What's less likely? While engaging a hoard of angry vigilantes, the IDF takes the time to shoot wounded on the ground. It's just not very plausible, given the scenario.

68 posted on 06/03/2010 8:22:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded

Again, good shooting.

78 posted on 06/03/2010 8:27:08 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

Um...

ok...


88 posted on 06/03/2010 8:31:14 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Christians: Stand for Christ or stand aside...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

No, actually four to the head and one in the chest sounds like he was targeted by two or three different soldiers at the same time. Someone went center mass while the others went for the headshot.

Not that it matters though, the end result is still a dead terrorist so what do I care how many people got an assist on this one?


91 posted on 06/03/2010 8:32:33 AM PDT by paladin1_dcs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

“Let’s cut to the chase: 4 shots at close range to the head and one to the chest sounds a lot more like a case of shooting the wounded, than an indication of “good shooting.””

Who cares. I could only be more happy if he was gut shot and died in agony — he’s a terrorist and deserved to die.

Let this be a lesson to other terrorists.


117 posted on 06/03/2010 12:19:11 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson