To: Oldeconomybuyer
Well, at least Kagan is a babe!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice.
4 posted on
06/01/2010 2:05:53 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Oldeconomybuyer
9 posted on
06/01/2010 2:23:43 PM PDT by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned automobile is STILL A USED CAR!!!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As disgusting as many of the SC decisions on Constitutional Law, it’s incredible that ANY Dean would want to do away with the course. Furthermore isn’t it one of the required topics on the Multi-State Bar Exam?
And this woman wants to sit on the bench deciding Con Law cases?
Kyrie eleison
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why study the Supreme Law of the Land when black-robed philosopher kings have declared it to be living and breathing and subject to the changing whims of social justice?
12 posted on
06/01/2010 3:04:05 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Where the laws are not supreme, there demagogues spring up - Aristotle)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
All this talk about her “remarkable achievements” and no mention of the fact that she has no judicial experience whatsoever. She’s been nominated for a judicial post, not an academic one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
