[Ingtar]

Because it is not their side.

[Mark17]

Why is the Media Neglecting Israel’s Side of the Flotilla Attack?

Who knows? Maybe the media are a bunch of left wing, liberal socialist, pinko commie geeks.

[a fool in paradise]

The same reason they called the legal ousting of a president a “coup” and reported Hugo Chavez’s propaganda instead.

[a fool in paradise]

The same reason the media (Al Reuters et al) fabricated images of “Israeli bombing damage” several years ago.

[Noamie]

Because the media doesn’t care about truth? (Do I win a prize?)

A known Terrorist group organizes a “flotilla” to gang-run a blockade and the press can’t figure out why Israel has a problem with it.... Geez

Goes without saying that legitimate Aid Relief flows into Gaza everyday. Press acts like this is the only way to get “food” to Gaza. Which is ridiculous and untrue.

[Uncle Ike]

Israel has a side??

Who knew??

[DoughtyOne]

Six ships boarded, only one resisted.  That's what Al Jazeera says.

Of the 682 people from 42 countries aboard the six ships that were raided, 380 are believed to be Turkish.

The unmistakable fact is, Israel did not go in guns blazing.  Five ships were boarded without incident.  Only one ship had a crew intent on resisting Israeli commandos.

This was premeditated, and Israel had no choice.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/06/20106116559782549.html

[WayneS]

Because it’s ISRAEL’S side... duh.

[Cementjungle]

Why is the Media Neglecting Israel’s Side of the Flotilla Attack?

Simple. Media loves Obama, and Obama hates Jews.

[Jack Hydrazine]

Because 90+ percent of them are Leftists and Leftists are inherently anti-Semitic?

[TornadoAlley3]

Bible Prophecy?

[Flintlock]

Becuzz they are on OZero’s side.
HE is on the Muzzie side.
So....so are MSM.
What’s so hard about that?

[Zionist Conspirator]

If I had the stomach for it (which I don’t), I’d take a look at some “palaeo” nutjob hangout like “Original Dissent” and see how they spin this as “Zionist control of the media.”

[b4its2late]

Cause they don’t wanna hear the truth. Does not fit their agenda.

[Lancey Howard]

Huh.. Did you know that the same group that sponsors these “flotillas” is the same group that sponsored the “Millenium Bomber”? You didn’t? ABCCBSNBCCNNNYTIMES never mentioned it? Huh...

[BusterBear]

Because it’s politically incorrect to give Israel’s side more than a moment’s comment. It’s like in the old South, where someone taking a Black’s side was called a n***ger-lover. Nowadays, a reporter doesn’t want to be labeled a Jew-lover.

[RatRipper]

Have I not read that mideast/ Saudi investors have a big ownership stake in some of the major media outlets? If so, it would make sense that these sources would never give Israel a fair shake on news coverage.

[VOA]

“
Why is the Media Neglecting Israel’s Side of the Flotilla Attack?
“

The general MSM description of the Israeli Special Forces work as
an “assault” or “attack” has been jaw-dropping.

Well, not for me, but surely for some supporters of Israel here in the USA.

The muted comments of The White House probably show that The Anointed One
(aka Messiah) is listening to some of the few rational remarks from
Rahm-Bo seeing how about 60% of Americans support Israel (and understand
the WorldWide Islamic Jihad).

[Jack Hammer]

Come on, that’s too easy. The Democrat Ministry of Propaganda does what Obama expects them to do; and he’s attempting to cultivate the Arabs.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

The MSM is anti-Semite and pro-Islamic Terrorist....that is why they refuse to cover Israel’s side of the story