Replies

Kessler is a MittBot, his guy couldn’t win the primaries in 08 and has less of a chance in 2012

Indeed. As to the author's assertion that Palin is a typical politician . . . no, Romney and Huckabee are typical. No one is writing columns about what they think about Rand Paul's interview.

A proper discussion of the 1964 Civil Rights Act would take at LEAST 45 minutes. The context of Jim Crow in the South at the time, which in some cases ordered, and not merely tolerated, segregation in places of public accommodation, would have to be included. Whether the act is Constitutional or not is also a proper topic to discuss. There might be some wonderful laws that would not be Constitutional. Maybe this one ought to be permanently enshrined, at least in skeletal form, if it is one of those laws.

An endorsement of a candidate simply means, that all things considered, the endorsed candidate is more worthy of support than his opponent. If said candidate had to be "right" on every issue, there would be no endorsing whatsoever.

I am presently a Palin supporter. It is not set in stone, and I do not think her to be a goddess. But when so-called conservatives, especially those who are correspondents in D.C. cite their pals who are also power brokers in D.C. , of course, agree, though anonymously, that Palin is a typical politician who has no serious political future, I would get as defensive as any Palin acolyte, simply out of a sense of fair play and decency. I bet this clown was saying she would be irrelevant 10 months ago. If all she can do is draw crowds, and not be a serious contender, why is he wasting valuable electrons and Cisco IP packets on her? Why does he turn to his D.C. power broker pals who are in her sights for the authoritative word? Why are they too cowardly to come out if she is so irrelevant? They fear her in the same way that lefties fear her. Is it no wonder that many of us perceive the Kesslers of the world as being part of the problem?