Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

Your delivery method was the problem, Laz. Rights of individuals should not be taken because of a mistake on the part of the delivery service and Glock. That firearm should have been sent to delivery to a named individual (You).

I have a gunshop and stand to benefit financially from this interpretation of this law (via transfers). However, this law sucks, and will just drive up the costs to the consumer without accomplishing a damned thing. What a waste of productive people’s time.


30 posted on 06/01/2010 9:26:08 AM PDT by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ExpatGator

In Calif, each transfer also requires another background check. Even to get your pawned gun back. If you don’t pass, you don’t get it back.

And I read that there may be new reasons to fail a check, such as minor ‘mental’ conditions. And returning soldiers and vets that ask for counseling can be classified as ‘mental’, etc.

Not to mention X number of days wait. And in Calif, there is 30 days wait between purchases (don’t know how this relates to transfers of own gun such as return from repair).


31 posted on 06/01/2010 9:38:54 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (If you could read my mind ... just count up the felonies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson