Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
"While the crime they were charged with was false, what they did was also a crime, and if not currently on the books it should be."

Could you share your evidence with us, please. From what I recall they hired two women to perform as strippers. Not exactly something to warm a parent's heart, but not a crime. And as long as we have a first amendment it should not be. Immoral, perhaps; but not illegal.

Unless you have some evidence that the MSM overlooked in their persecut, I mean investigation.

117 posted on 05/30/2010 8:04:53 PM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: In Maryland

The First Amendment existed to protect POLITICAL speech — words, first and foremost. In origin it did not mean to protect “arts” such as dancing, nor would most Founders have ever agreed that it protected lewdness.


119 posted on 05/30/2010 8:56:35 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: In Maryland

I have asked bvw the same thing 3 times, and they just respond with stripping leads to communism. Totally ignoring the fact that they recommend arresting someone for breaking a law that doesnt exist.


122 posted on 05/31/2010 5:27:54 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson