Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: In Maryland

The First Amendment existed to protect POLITICAL speech — words, first and foremost. In origin it did not mean to protect “arts” such as dancing, nor would most Founders have ever agreed that it protected lewdness.


119 posted on 05/30/2010 8:56:35 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
The First Amendment existed to protect POLITICAL speech — words, first and foremost. In origin it did not mean to protect "arts" such as dancing, nor would most Founders have ever agreed that it protected lewdness.

James Madison on the First Amendment and licentiousness of the press:

Is, then, the Federal Government, it will be asked, destitute of every authority for restraining the licentiousness of the press, and for shielding itself against the libellous attacks which may be made on those who administer it?

The Constitution alone can answer this question. If no such power be expressly delegated, and if it be not both necessary and proper to carry into execution an express power--above all, if it be expressly forbidden, by a declaratory amendment to the Constitution--the answer must be, that the Federal Government is destitute of all such authority.

James Madison, Report on the Virginia Resolutions

Jan. 1800 Writings 6:385--401

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_speechs24.html

______________________________________

LICEN''TIOUSNESS, n. Excessive indulgence of liberty; contempt of the just restraints of law, morality and decorum.

http://machaut.uchicago.edu/?resource=Webster%27s&word=licentiousness&use1828=on (Webster's 1828 edition)

120 posted on 05/30/2010 11:14:32 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson