And I’m certain they would have come to the same conclusion had this happened under GWB’s administration/sarc.
My biggest question—and I’m being objective here—don’t all politicians offer their rivals big time political positions so they can get enough votes to be the nominee? And what about all those people who donate to the campaign and “become” ambassadors?”
So to the NY Times, if I go to someone and ask how much or what would I need to give you to get you to do something for me, that does not meet the elements of trying to bribe someone?
Who gives a crap what the NYT says or feels?
They never get anything right, to begin with.
Note to NYT: “Hurry up and fold, will ya? You’re wasting valuable air, ink and paper.”
For months Sestak described the offer as a "JOB." An unpaid advisory position is not a job, and the Slimes, Sestak, and the WH all know this. This latest memo out of the WH is a cover story if I ever heard one. Even the Slimes should be offended by such a transparent lie.
NYT gets its orders from the White House.
Well, I’m sure the NY Times would have excused a similar offer if it had been made a few years ago by the Bush Administration. See, that’s why the NY Times is such a paragon of journalistic integrity.
The NY Times? Didn’t that use to be a NEWSpaper.
The NYS are lawyers now?
Idiot posers.
New York Times... the traitor paper.
As time goes by more and more I wonder why the NYT
and the rest of the MSM just doesn’t come out and
admit that they fundamentally believe that what is
moral, ethical, and/or legal is dependent on political
philosophy.
“It was worse than a crime; it was a blunder”?