Ron Paul "has some reservations" about Arizona SB 1070

examiner.com/ ^ | May 27 2010 | Martin Hill

[Tom Hawks]

well, frankly the bastard can just go to Hell.

I am with you brother, I am with you.

[SoCalPol]

to bad the McConnell wing of the GOP in KY put up a guy who was a Bill Clinton supporter and voted for.

[samadams2000]

Wow, they compromised him already?

[Gator113]

Ron P... shut up and take another med.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Simply put, Ronald Paul has “privacy” concerns.”

We in Arizona have concerns too....

murder

rape(illegals have a thing for under age girls)

drug dealing

DUI (rite of passage for illegals)

grand theft

kidnapping

We do Ron Ron Ron

We do Ron Ron

[Republican Wildcat]

I'm glad that he is (at least "officially") on the GOP side now, but it hasn't been all that long since Bill-Clinton-Democrat Trey Grayson switched his voter registration. Just since he realized he might have an easier time winning as a "Republican".

The primary is over and you just can't stop smearing Trey Grayson with your bogus attacks. It was 14 years ago that Trey Grayson switched at the age of 24, long before he ever ran for political office, and it was certainly not at a time "easier" for winning office as a Republican, as it was in the midst of the 31 year monopoly on the statewide offices in Kentucky by the Democrats. But for Paul Patton's infidelities and other scandals, it was a trend that might still be in effect today - and certainly Trey Grayson had no way of knowing Paul Patton's behavior would be exposed just before the 2003 campaign back when he had become a Republican at the age of 24 to make it "easier" to run as a Republican 7 years later.

[Christian_Capitalist]

The primary is over and you just can't stop smearing Trey Grayson with your bogus attacks.

Just as soon as the sour-grapes Paul Derangement Idiots quit attacking the guy who actually won the GOP Primary by almost 2-to-1 and is our Republican Nominee for Senate. MORONS, all of them, every one!!

[onyx]

Where are the other smug and often times nasty Libertarian posters who are forever touting Ron Paul and professing their support for AZ’s law? The two do not compute.

[onyx]

Arizona’s is Constitutional and reasonable on all counts. Arizona made certain of that.

A person has to “reach and strain” to try to find fault with AZ’s law. Ron Paul sounds exactly like the ACLU.

[Theophilus]

“Rand Paul is going to be way more trouble than he is worth.”

That's why I can't wait to send him to the Senate. I hope he gives both Democrats and RINO Republicans hell.

[NoLibZone]

Ron a Texan and Fed employee is opposed to AZ’s law.

Wasn’t he saying he was for States Rights at some point in his very long career?

[onyx]

Yep, and he says he’s also for balancing the federal budget, but he’s one of four House Republicans who tried to break the “no earmark pledge”.

[krb]

It is highly unlikely that he would comment on a piece of legislation he hadn’t read.

[skinkinthegrass]

A Kentucky Ping.

...for those interested. :D

[svcw]

Then one wonders how he can be bothered by it.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Paul by opening his big mouth, gives aid to the Democrats. Shut up, Ron, you dummy!

[Allegra]

I care about what Ron Paul has to say about anything about as much as I care about what any other liberal has to say about these conservative bills.

GO ARIZONA!!

[Allegra]

He is sounding like RINO.

He is one. A DeceptiCon.

[SoCalPol]

If Ron Paul had a brain he would play with it.
Not only he questions Arizona SB1070 but yesterday
Paul voted to abolish “don’t ask, don’t tell” with
the other Liberals

[Impy]

My first instinct is to call “fail” on Paul’s comment.