Replies

To: FormerACLUmember

She looks 43, not 33! Maybe it’s the lighting ...

I just hope she’s a conservative.

31 posted on 05/28/2010 9:53:38 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)

To: nanetteclaret

She looks 43, not 33! Maybe it’s the lighting ...

I agree. I don't think it's the lighting. More like years of lazing in the Sun getting a tan.

116 posted on 05/28/2010 10:18:15 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)

To: nanetteclaret

She’s attractive, but yes, she does look 43!

122 posted on 05/28/2010 10:19:38 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just my 2 cents!)

To: nanetteclaret

You are right. She does look to be in her forties-early forties.

123 posted on 05/28/2010 10:19:52 AM PDT by dandiegirl

To: nanetteclaret

I was thinking the same thing. Sun damage. The sun can be devastating on women. Not good for men either.

139 posted on 05/28/2010 10:24:35 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)

To: nanetteclaret

I concur!!

PRE NUPT PRE NUPT PRE NUPT PRE NUPT PRE NUPT PRE NUPT PRE NUPT

I can’t say this enough in today’s pro-biomom courts!!

278 posted on 05/28/2010 1:15:25 PM PDT by AbolishCSEU

To: nanetteclaret

<She looks 43, not 33! Maybe it’s the lighting ...

No kidding. My son is 33 and I teach grad students who are around that age and none of them look that old. She’s 40 if she’s a day.

303 posted on 05/28/2010 2:19:45 PM PDT by radiohead (Buy ammo, get your kids out of government schools, pray for the Republic.)

To: nanetteclaret

I agree she ain’t no spring chicken. Nice teeth, though.

345 posted on 05/28/2010 5:48:20 PM PDT by WestSylvanian

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794