Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Do you Sestak?
1 posted on 05/28/2010 8:55:24 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

Hey, they now say it was an UNPAID ADvisory position!! Yeah right!!


2 posted on 05/28/2010 8:57:00 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Come on Sestak, they are firing torpedoes across your bow.


3 posted on 05/28/2010 8:57:26 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What did the WH have to say to sestaks Bro?

ANOTHER Job offer?


4 posted on 05/28/2010 8:57:41 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

In the con man’s lexicon, I believe this is known as “cooling the mark.”


7 posted on 05/28/2010 9:01:35 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Just another day in Oceania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Remember the name David Plouffe.


8 posted on 05/28/2010 9:02:14 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

With the Dems nominating a sleestak, can a Wookie be far behind?
9 posted on 05/28/2010 9:02:28 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Dear News Organizations: Another Mistake

Sestak was not appointed to the grade of Rear Admiral by anyone. Navy officers are selected for promotion to all grades up to O-8 (Rear Admiral, Upper Half, or RADM). Sestak was appointed to Vice Admiral (O-9) by the White House. When a new Chief of Naval Operations (CNO - O-10) was appointed, he immediately fired Sestak because Sestak was a raving tyrant. At that time, Sestak reverted to his permanent grade, Rear Admiral. That he campaigned in a Vice Admiral's uniform was a double violation of the rules.

10 posted on 05/28/2010 9:03:06 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Now we’re going to find out who’s more clever - Obama or the Clintons.


11 posted on 05/28/2010 9:04:06 AM PDT by randita (Visit keyhouseraces.com for a list of vulnerable DEM and must hold GOP House seats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Smoke screen while they rape America behind the scenes.


18 posted on 05/28/2010 9:07:37 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Hold up here Hoss.... Gibbsey for MONTHS said, “I will check into that” “I will gt back to you on that”, “I don’t know, I will get on that” and NOTHING was ever gotten to.

What did Gibbsey know and when did he know it?

Why did it take the White House MONTHS to answer these questions? If nothing “Bad” happened, WHY DODGE THE QUESTION FOR MONTHS??????????

Because something bad DID happen.

REMEMBER SCOOTER LIBBY!!!!!! - Payback’s a BITCH ain’t it?


27 posted on 05/28/2010 9:21:01 AM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Rational Rahmbo/Chicago Mob tactics. They’ve lost their grip on Specter’s short hairs, so now are looking to get a grip on Sestak’s.


30 posted on 05/28/2010 9:47:48 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson