Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: White House asked Clinton to talk to Sestak about Senate run
Washington Post ^ | May 28, 2010 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 05/28/2010 7:09:26 AM PDT by maggief

Senior White House advisers asked former President Bill Clinton to talk to Joe Sestak about whether he was serious about running for Senate, and to feel out whether he'd be open to other alternatives, according to sources familiar with the situation.

But the White House maintains that the Clinton-Sestak discussions were informal, according to the sources. The White House, under pressure to divulge the specifics of its interactions with Sestak, will release a formal statement later today outlining their version of events, including Clinton's involvement.

According to the sources, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel asked Clinton and his longtime adviser, lawyer Doug Band, to talk to Sestak about the race. It's unclear right now whether the White House will say that Clinton was asked to suggest specific administration positions for Sestak, whether Clinton floated positions on his own, whether Clinton discussed other options not related to the adminstration, or whether employment even came up at all in the talks.

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: iwpredicts; sestak; sestakgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-319 next last
To: maggief

I bet Hillary is dusting off her contributers list now.


141 posted on 05/28/2010 8:06:28 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

It’s still illegal and in fact if they conspired to subvert the law this way...then it is a conspiracy to commit...etc...

These arrogant fools...we need to take them down...


142 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:01 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You gotta admit, those lieing bastards are good.

I didn't see this one coming.

143 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:13 AM PDT by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Excellent, excellent point.


144 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:25 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: thouworm
and he spoke to the White House . . . about what’s going to occur

Sounds as much like conspiracy to obstruct justice as anything I can imagine.

145 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:32 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Fort Marcy Park


146 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:47 AM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Barter-Gate. And we all know who Deep Throat is. Rahm.


147 posted on 05/28/2010 8:07:52 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

The administration was talking to Blagoyavitch (sp?) too weren’t they. These guys aren’t too bright, for people who are supposed to be smarter than the rest of us.


148 posted on 05/28/2010 8:08:52 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (J. D. Hayworth, the next Senator, the Great State of Arizona - Sen. Poopdeck, Panama is calling...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

So, now Sestak has to take down 2 Presidents if he wants to come clean.

Hillary will be gone by the fourth of July.


149 posted on 05/28/2010 8:09:09 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: maggief

An informal bribe is still a bribe.

I’d hold my breath for impeachment but don’t expect that to happen. If we’re lucky there’ll be a large turnover in the advisor positions.


150 posted on 05/28/2010 8:09:28 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Thnx!


151 posted on 05/28/2010 8:10:34 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: maggief
More from Major Garrett on Fox. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/28/white-house-asked-clinton-urge-sestak-drop-senate-race/

152 posted on 05/28/2010 8:12:38 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2523046/posts


153 posted on 05/28/2010 8:14:19 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Obama turns to the Artful Dodger.

Won’t pin him down.

My sense is that there’s no way this happened like this. I doubt that Clinton was even involved. This is their strategic story designed to save both Sestak and Obama.


154 posted on 05/28/2010 8:14:58 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Now Presenting: Celebrity Death Match - The Obamas vs. The Clintons


155 posted on 05/28/2010 8:15:40 AM PDT by golas1964 (It takes an ACORN to raze a village.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
I've been unable to ascertain precisely what Clinton discussed with Sestak in terms of his future options, but the release of the White House's formal response will clear that up.

WOW, Greg, you're mighty trusting! Put down the kool-aide and take off the rose colored glasses for a minute.

156 posted on 05/28/2010 8:16:40 AM PDT by jellybean (Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org/index.php for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie; maggief; Ann Archy; Genoa
sestak said it was a “white house official”. the clenis is not a “white house official”.

You nailed ANOTHER important point.

On how many separate occasions did Sestak or his representative receive communication (of any kind) and by whom?

157 posted on 05/28/2010 8:16:43 AM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: maggief
How long before we hear Clinton say,
“I did not have illicit discussions with that man, Mr. Sestak.”
158 posted on 05/28/2010 8:17:15 AM PDT by rightsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

It’s Clinton’s fault!!! Is he sure Bush didn’t talk to him too?


159 posted on 05/28/2010 8:17:21 AM PDT by w1andsodidwe (How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“outlining their version of events. . . .”

Yeah, I see. . .


160 posted on 05/28/2010 8:18:03 AM PDT by daydreamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson