Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: White House asked Clinton to talk to Sestak about Senate run
Washington Post ^ | May 28, 2010 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 05/28/2010 7:09:26 AM PDT by maggief

Senior White House advisers asked former President Bill Clinton to talk to Joe Sestak about whether he was serious about running for Senate, and to feel out whether he'd be open to other alternatives, according to sources familiar with the situation.

But the White House maintains that the Clinton-Sestak discussions were informal, according to the sources. The White House, under pressure to divulge the specifics of its interactions with Sestak, will release a formal statement later today outlining their version of events, including Clinton's involvement.

According to the sources, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel asked Clinton and his longtime adviser, lawyer Doug Band, to talk to Sestak about the race. It's unclear right now whether the White House will say that Clinton was asked to suggest specific administration positions for Sestak, whether Clinton floated positions on his own, whether Clinton discussed other options not related to the adminstration, or whether employment even came up at all in the talks.

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: iwpredicts; sestak; sestakgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-319 next last
To: Genoa
Ha ha! Put Clinton under oath!!

Maybe we'll finally find out what the meaning of "is" is.

101 posted on 05/28/2010 7:42:51 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Was he offered a job?

I guess it all depends on your definition of "offer"...

Actually, with Bill Clinton involved it all depends on your definition of "job". :-)

102 posted on 05/28/2010 7:43:31 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Everyone needs valid ID except illegal aliens and the President - only in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

I think that is exactly what they are doing - but wouldn’t it be fun if Slick Willy would throw Obama under the bus.....


103 posted on 05/28/2010 7:44:03 AM PDT by MissH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Wonder if bubba gets something for hitlery for this lie.


104 posted on 05/28/2010 7:44:07 AM PDT by Carley (DADDY DIDN'T PLUG THE HOLE YET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
naw. this is over by the end of next week. it will never stick to clinton let alone 0.
105 posted on 05/28/2010 7:44:07 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't go chasing waterfalls.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

So you are buying into that old line.

No controlling legal authority?

I’m not buy it.

Can you imagine anyone in the Bush administration, either father or son, doing something like this.


106 posted on 05/28/2010 7:45:52 AM PDT by Carley (DADDY DIDN'T PLUG THE HOLE YET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
This is really interesting.... I don't see the toon being a willing participant....so there must be a big payoff.... yes, I think this could quite possibly make watergate look like a silly game.... but of course, it will take a savvy investigative journalist....

oh well, never mind...move along... nothing to see here....
107 posted on 05/28/2010 7:47:22 AM PDT by Newton ('No arsenal is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.' -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maggief

This is exactly why Sestak should have been put undr oath and made to talk...before a story could be hatched...


108 posted on 05/28/2010 7:48:08 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Now all of a sudden the story is that Sestak was offered an “unpaid” position. How do we know he’s not lying, along with the White House, in order to put the controversy to rest?

Didn’t Sestak use the word “job” originally? Or am I wrong.


109 posted on 05/28/2010 7:48:10 AM PDT by Dementio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

bj.


110 posted on 05/28/2010 7:49:01 AM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Yeah, they asked Clinton to talk to Sestak. When did they ask him? Yesterday at lunch! They asked him to SAY he talked to Sestak. But Clinton will say he didn’t offer him a job and who always gets away with lieing? “I did not offer a job to that man. Mr. Sestak. Now I have to get back to work for Master Obama.”

I knew someone would run interference or fall on his sword but I never dreamed it would be Clinton. islamabama looks more and more like the a.c. What power of persuasion this guy has!


111 posted on 05/28/2010 7:50:10 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Just heard the news..IMHO, there’s far more to it..it doesn’t make sense...Who benefits? How does Slick getting Spector the nomination help the Clintons?


112 posted on 05/28/2010 7:50:35 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Carley
“Can you imagine anyone in the Bush administration, either father or son, doing something like this.”

Does the party mechanism encourage and discourage people to run or not run?
Of course!!

When that person is the President and they offer a direct inducement to do it; that is another matter entirely.

But between those points; where do things go over the line?

I don't know the answer to that....

113 posted on 05/28/2010 7:51:37 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Newton

Both Hillary and Bill are ensnared in Obama’s sticky net. Let’s see if they have the savvy to extricate themselves.


114 posted on 05/28/2010 7:52:21 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

You just have to watch some of Hillary’s recent appearences in foreign countries to diminish her hopes for 2012. She looks AWFUL! And now she’s telling people that it’s OK to tax the wealthy MORE.

With all her money, can’t she afford a hairdresser on call?


115 posted on 05/28/2010 7:55:07 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dalight

“So you add a middle man and that makes it legal?”

THAT was my first question too! Does it not still go to INTENT?


116 posted on 05/28/2010 7:55:23 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Involving Clinton in this was a huge mistake for the Obama WH. Just the number of replies on this thread is an indicator of the amount of interest Clinton’s involvement will generate. Now this obscure charge from Sestak has star power. The media will chase a story (for Obama or not) if there is public interest.

Everybody was claiming the Gulf spill would be Obama’s Katrina. I think the Sestak story will be Obama’s Valerie Plame. It will go on and on, muddying the WH’s message.


117 posted on 05/28/2010 7:56:00 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Holy CRAP!! They are pinning it on the Bubbas....I smell a scapegoat desperation moment from the Joker and his buttboys. I wonder if the SHE-DEVIL will open wide and take it? There goes the Rapist and Hiltery’s presidential aspirations out the window.
118 posted on 05/28/2010 7:56:06 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Can we impeach him again ?

Nah...Once is enough for the first black president but let's go for the second black president, they make a pretty good pair.

119 posted on 05/28/2010 7:56:38 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
And he knows we know it, there's the rub. He don't care, and will come out of this as the same liar he has always been.

You have to admit, it was a good call to lay the blame on the Clintons, nothing sticks to them, and he lies better than anyone I have ever seen, except Zero.

120 posted on 05/28/2010 7:56:38 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson