Posted on 05/27/2010 9:38:56 PM PDT by pissant
It looks like Carly Fiorina has moved into the lead in the race to be the Republican nominee for the Senate in California. What's less clear is whether, from a conservative point of view, her nomination would be desirable.
Fiorina would be the ultimate stealth nominee. Not only has she never held public office, but until fairly recently, she failed even to vote in most elections.
These days, when it's in her interest to do so, she talks like a conservative. However, her past provides little reason to believe that she deeply holds conservative convictions. And if she doesn't, but instead adopts positions based on her political interests, then she's unlikely to represent a blue state like California as a reliable conservative.
Aspects of Fiornia's campaigning also leave me cold. During a debate earlier this week, she responded to a substantive attack from conservative Chuck DeVore by saying, "I'm sure it's very frustrating for Chuck DeVore to have so many conservatives supporting me; maybe it makes Chuck DeVore, who is dog-paddling at 14 percent in the polls ... feel better to belittle other people's conservative credentials."
The standards for conduct during candidates' debates are pretty low these days, but taunting an opponent for low poll numbers strikes me as quite unappealing. DeVore has every reason to question Fiorina's conservative credentials, such as they are. Her campaign certainly hasn't been shy about questioning those of her other opponent, Tom Campbell.
Republican voters in California don't have an easy choice to make. DeVore is a strong conservative, but seems like a long-shot against Sen. Barbara Boxer in a "blue" California. Unlike Fiorina, Campbell has a long track record from which to discern his principles and beliefs. Many of them are conservative, but some are not. The National Taxpayers Union, an anti-tax group, gave Campbell "A" and "B" grades during his time in Congress; the American Conservative Union, which takes into account social issues, gave Campbell, who has a substantial libertarian streak, a lifetime rating of 54 during his final year in office on a scale where 80 is considered conservative. There are also concerns about Campbell's level of support for Israel.
To be sure, all three candidates are vastly preferable to Boxer. But the past decade should have taught conservatives to worry not just about electing Republicans, but also about which Republicans we elect.
DeVore PING
Who knows, maybe Fiorina had a conservative epiphany when Obamacare passed. There’s nothing like a life-threatening illness to make one appreciate the U. S. health care system.
She was well passed the life threatening stage when she called the new Arizona immigration law “tinged with racism”.
“It looks like Carly Fiorina has moved into the lead in the race to be the Republican nominee for the Senate in California.”
Sounds like they are running at Santa Anita. I’ve heard Carly is a Mudder ...
Chuck Devore already has my vote. Brown is tied to the SEIU. Campbell is a known full fledged RINO. Fiorina is a crap-shoot. We just don’t know how much of a RINO she is. If it comes to it I would take Carly over Brown.
Man, I am tired of the race baiting machine. Perhaps it is not possible to elect a true conservative in CA anymore.
Who is brown?
Let’s make sure she pulls up limp in the last turn.
Can some one explain how any candidate, no matter how desirable, who loses to Boxer does any good to anybody?
Oh may be by losing the desirable candidate does benefit the
liberals by giving Boxer 6 more years.
Can someone tell me why shills for RINOs would come on and spout nonsense, when the polls have consistently shown that DeVore matches up against Babs at least as well as Gnarly.
She was an affirmative action CEO but she was hired for a mission and she did her job. They knew why she was there even if I hated it personally.
She went on though to use the political capital to further push the Compaq Merger which will be an albatross around her neck for the rest of her life. The merger where 2+2=2.
No Wonder there is doubts to her political proclivities.
Within her job at HP she took on entrenched interests within the company and won. We will need that tenacity in a Governor to cut taxes and spending.
The only question is, is this time she won’t be answerable to a Board of Directors. She will do what she wants and we aren’t sure what that is, is she Conservative enough or is she just a wolf in sheep’s clothing?
I look forward to seeing what happens.
“Let’s make sure she pulls up limp in the last turn.”
I know I would if I took a turn with her...
*groan*
*groan*
I know...sorry...
No she realized that becoming a congress puke is the only guarantee to her healthcare vs Obamacare and to hell with the rest of the people; mainly the ones that are dumb enough to vote for her.
Most likely, if elected she will fall down on her knees and worship Obama style politics.
Get real and smart. Vote Chuck DeVore if you want a real breath of fresh air change.
BUMP
Haven't heard of one. Have you?
If you are right, I would favor DeVore to be the nominee.
I will take even Campbell or Fiorina over Boxer any day.
I would be mad as hell if Boxer wins 6 more years.
Anybody but Boxer. Whoever makes it to the final against Boxer is fine with me.A solid conservative like DeVore can't get elected statewide in California anymore. Too many Reagan conservatives have left or died out, leaving the social leeches.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.