Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy
I'll give you one word to explain why Nixon didn't challenge:

Ike.

If Nixon had the full backing of the incumbent, with all his power and lever-pulling, of course he would have challenged. But I don't think he could count on Ike to help him in any way. Think back to 2000: I can't recall any instances where Clinton really worked to help Gore in the challenge.

72 posted on 05/29/2010 4:30:48 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: LS; fieldmarshaldj

I’ve never thought about it before but you’re right, I don’t remember Clinton helping Gore.

Everything I’ve read said Ike took 1960 hard, almost like a personal insult that Nixon didn’t win his ‘third term’ for him. You’d think that would mean he would have favored a challenge. I guess he didn’t want to ‘divide the country’ with it.


74 posted on 05/29/2010 5:17:35 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson