That hilarious puppet video put her over the top of those lying arsewhoops in the WH. Alinsky couldn't have done it better (had he been on the right side).
This has happened before:
Look what happened in 2007 [This is Big Sis talking when she was still AZ governor]:
Arizona Border Encounter Gets Political
Jan. 29, 2007
Excerpt
Four National Guard soldiers from Tennessee were at a lookout post at the border when they were approached by six to eight gunmen wearing bulletproof vests. One of the gunmen came within 35 feet of the observation site, according to investigators’ summaries.
The soldiers contacted Border Patrol agents and pulled back, investigators concluded. The Border Patrol tracked the armed men back to the border but could not locate them. No shots were fired.
Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano, National Guard officials and some state lawmakers defended the decision to call in the Border Patrol, saying the troops are not supposed to perform law enforcement duties. The governor’s office has said the rules allow Guard members to use force when they believe they face an imminent threat and all other means are exhausted.
“I don’t think that it’s up to the committee to negotiate the rules of engagement,” Napolitano said. “Those rules of engagement were negotiated with the National Guard at the federal level.”
The troops were among the 6,400 National Guard members sent to the four southern border states to support immigration agents, and leave the agents with more time to catch illegal immigrants.
The support duties include monitoring border points, assisting with cargo inspection and operate surveillance cameras.
“We don’t apprehend,” said Maj. Paul Aguirre, a spokesman for the Arizona National Guard. “We don’t detain. We don’t transport.”
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/1/29/80614.shtml
Securing the border is not on a “One World Order” presidents agenda. No way.
Per Obama’s Rule of Engagement......
No weapons, no detainment, stay off of “their” favorite trails, don't check for drugs or weapons......
Ping!
“I am anxious to hear of the details that have not yet been disclosed of where, how and for how long additional forces will be deployed.”
Add to that “how many”. “Up to 1200 troops” technically could amount to zero, or less.
So why are there still so many people championing Sarah Palin as the next president, when she’s a real lightweight, watered-down version of the ral thing when compared to Jan Brewer?
I bet Jan will complete her full term as governor, and be elected to another. And I’ll be the first to jump on the Jan Brewer 2012 bandwagon.
So why are there still so many people championing Sarah Palin as the next president, when she’s a real lightweight, watered-down version of the real thing when compared to Jan Brewer?
I bet Jan will complete her full term as governor, and be elected to another. And I’ll be the first to jump on the Jan Brewer 2012 bandwagon.
Let’s think about this a minute. Arizona takes matters in their own hands and gets an unparalleled barage of negative comments from the White House, and now they’re sending in the National Guard. A last minute change of plans could have them taking over the statehouse under the pretext of insurrection, and declaring an emergency “election” enforced by union thugs for an Obama stooge. Am I being paranoid?
I don’t want troops. I want a fence.
