Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fergie Gets Back To New York as Friends Say She Wants To Leave The UK For Good
Daily Mail ^ | 5:25 PM on 26th May 2010 | David Gardner

Posted on 05/26/2010 9:48:37 AM PDT by Niuhuru

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Niuhuru

Another immigrant we don’t need!


21 posted on 05/26/2010 10:45:01 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
For a carton of smokes she’ll wash and wax your car.

LOL!

22 posted on 05/26/2010 10:55:53 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

I wonder what her public value would be without the duchess title? No one would need to call her “your grace” anymore if QEII gave her dough in return for the title.

The whole thing’s a mite tricky.

We’ll see.


23 posted on 05/26/2010 11:02:52 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BossLady

LOLOLOLOL.


24 posted on 05/26/2010 11:09:41 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

It’s true! :)


25 posted on 05/26/2010 11:14:45 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I suffer from B.S. - Barack Syndrome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
She should have gotten job skills and made an honest living.

Like Koo Stark.

26 posted on 05/26/2010 11:16:14 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Maybe she look at it as sort of lobbying? Maybe she could come here and be a lobbyist???


27 posted on 05/26/2010 11:37:02 AM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

There was nothing stopping her from taking a technical course and making a solid quid from her job. She had more than enough to take a course learning say, phlebotomy, or anything else.


28 posted on 05/26/2010 12:10:34 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
I wonder what her public value would be without the duchess title?

GoldenPalace.com paid 28k for a grilled cheese sandwich.

29 posted on 05/26/2010 12:19:23 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

Wasn’t that a gilt-cheese sandwich? :)


30 posted on 05/26/2010 12:36:22 PM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

She would make a perfect dem senator.


31 posted on 05/26/2010 1:31:59 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
She should have gotten job skills and made an honest living.

How, then, did she make it to the top?

32 posted on 05/26/2010 1:57:21 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Initially she was a ‘second tier sloane’ (had connections, just not massive amounts of money) and married Andrew after meeting Diana. Before marrying Andrew she supposedly did secretarial work, did work as a chalet girl to afford skiing holidays, and also supposedly did desk work for a PR company.

After the divorce she did Weight Watchers, ensdoresments (Diana was banned from engaging in commercial activity as a result of the Duchess’s actions) and children’s books. And she did do work with the movie “The Young Victoria” where she was an executive producer.

But during that time she could have paid for schooling and gotten real job skills. She was living rent free, had fifteen thousand a year, in British pounds and she could have lived with a thousand pounds a year and still had three thousand left to save. With a good job, she could have made much, much more and then lived very well while doing charity and doing some jet setting and no one would have begrudged her a good life.

Perhaps the reason the RF didn’t pay her more out of their personal funds is that each royal is somewhat expected to live indepedently. It’s a know fact that celebrities have bigger incomes yearly than the RF. Diana and Charles lived on the income of the Duchy of Cornwall, amongst other investments and made 1.7 million a year, including their civil list allotments and budget for their wardrobes from the Foreign Office.

When you really look at it, the RF operates at a smaller scale and are consistent in their budgetary needs.

The problem with Sarah is that she couldn’t stay within her civil list allotment that was supposed to be used for her offical wardrobe/duties/travel and kept blowing more and more money on her food budget, her wardrobe, and her other expenditures that weren’t part of her official life.

According to some accounts, she was blowing money on out of season fruits, fifteen different flavors of ice cream, also shopping sprees. The RF might make a lot of money, but they aren’t like the former French monarchs and they are responsible with what they eat, wear, and work to avoid being wasteful.

She married, like many women of her generation, but didn’t kepe it together.


33 posted on 05/26/2010 2:23:59 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

I wonder though, what would have happened if she had intorduced a terrorist to her husband. One comment mentioned how they wondered what her vetting process was.


34 posted on 05/26/2010 2:24:50 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

She’s like an answer prayer to the tabloids.


35 posted on 05/27/2010 2:25:14 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Impy

For sure! What a (to use Limey-speak) wanker.


36 posted on 05/27/2010 7:22:25 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I suffer from B.S. - Barack Syndrome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
From last year...

Cost of Royal Family rises £1.5m

The total cost to the public of keeping the monarchy increased by £1.5m to £41.5m in the 2008/9 financial year.

37 posted on 05/27/2010 7:26:57 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson