Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MollyKuehl

I have to admit that this is the one initiative I’m completely on the fence about. Ordinarily, I really like the 2/3 voting requirement—for the State budget, for new taxes. And I know the Sac Bee is strongly opposing this measture—and generally I tend to vote exactly the opposite of the Bee.

But at the same time, I love the lower rates I enjoy through SMUD, and I feel sorry for my relatives that are PG&E electrical customers (they do pay a lot more than I do).

Thanks for the additional information. It should help this voter be a little more informed on this questionable and confusing initiative.


9 posted on 05/25/2010 10:34:17 AM PDT by The4thHorseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The4thHorseman

At the same time, my radio (not liberal) indicated that some communities have been appropriating PG & E systems as part of their take over of the service and thus protection of “property rights” is what is behind the ammendment.
The guest recommended a Yes vote.

Obviously PG&E believes they will be better off not losing this part of “their” traditional business. I used to support PG&E when they were non-political and simply prepared to provide power at regulated rates. Now with semi-degregulation I am not sure how to look at this.


12 posted on 05/28/2010 7:24:33 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (California engineer and teacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson