Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Axelrod: No evidence that Sestak is telling the truth (Spin)
HotAir ^ | May 25, 2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 05/25/2010 7:37:30 AM PDT by FTJM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: FTJM

Famous last words...


61 posted on 05/25/2010 8:48:27 AM PDT by MortMan (I'm just an injet printer in a holographic world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
Whoever runs against Sestak can use Axlerod’s words in campaign ads to respond to everything Sestak says in the future.

....But the President's top adviser said there is no evidence that Sestak is telling the truth.

“I'm the guy that is going to win this race, and I approve this message.”

62 posted on 05/25/2010 8:54:32 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I love “Lie to Me” and wish they’d devote a show to analyzing all the lies knowingly told by Obama during the course of the health care debate.

To be fair, it’s POSSIBLE the man was stupid enough to believe all the malarkey he was spouting, but I’m guessing it’s more likely there were all sorts of “tells” he exhibited repeatedly that would demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt he well knew how mendacious he was being.

Next fall, Republicans ought to use videos of him in action in PSA spots designed to educate voters on How to Tell When Your President is Lying...


63 posted on 05/25/2010 9:02:44 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Another MAJOR gaff by the DIMWITS... on either/both side(S). It’s win-win for us no matter.

Toomey has the tools and now the opposition is going to look real bad. sestak either squeels or his own party throws him under the bus. Which ever side loses the battle for whom is the liar goes down.

Chalk up another victory for the good guys. This is getting so easy under Obummer.


64 posted on 05/25/2010 9:08:04 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
So, are we going to see headlines like:
Axelrod: PA Dem Senate Candidate Sestak A Liar

65 posted on 05/25/2010 9:11:59 AM PDT by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
Axelrod also acknowledged that there were “conversations” involving White House officials and Sestak, but said that those had been “looked at” by White House lawyers and “their conclusion was that it was perfect — the conversations were perfectly appropriate.”

White House lawyers can't *look at* conversations with White House officials and conclude they were *perfectly appropriate* -- we've reached the point where the IC come into play.

66 posted on 05/25/2010 9:13:58 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Well, well, well!!!

Sestak has their attention......

Why would Sestak announce the Administration attempted to bribe him, and he failed to report the bribe, unless it were true?


67 posted on 05/25/2010 9:16:04 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bummer calls opponents "Teabaggers". So we can call Kagan "Carpet Muncher." Right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Unless the White House put the bribe on paper or Sestak recorded the call, Axelrod is probably right that there is no evidence.

Axelrod say WH lawyers looked into it, which means they had to make records of their own investigation, names, conversations, who said what to whom when, why -- all of this is "evidence" regardless they claim it to be exculpatory. This is the kind of thing an IC would have access to in his investigation.

68 posted on 05/25/2010 9:18:23 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

WOW, that’s what they said about Obama being A Muslim, ‘his handlers said there was no proof’....(because it had been destroyed?) Well except for his school record....


69 posted on 05/25/2010 9:27:48 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
Axelrod also acknowledged that there were “conversations” involving White House officials and Sestak, but said that those had been “looked at” by White House lawyers and “their conclusion was that it was perfect — the conversations were perfectly appropriate.”

So the accused gets to be their own judge? If the "conversations" were "looked at," there must be a transcript somewhere, which also means that there is a recording.

Release the recording!

70 posted on 05/25/2010 9:29:34 AM PDT by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked." BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I’d say there at least as much evidence that Sestak is telling the truth as there is that Axelrod is telling the truth.


71 posted on 05/25/2010 9:31:46 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Barak Obama: “Sestak’s a liar. Vote for Sestak!”


72 posted on 05/25/2010 9:35:47 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

ANd there’s no evidence that the WH is telling the truth then also.....


73 posted on 05/25/2010 9:45:54 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Haha, a non-denial denial.

Next it'll be a modified limited hang out.

74 posted on 05/25/2010 9:50:40 AM PDT by Proud_texan (Scare people enough and they'll do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I want a special prosecutor. The Whitehouse should not be investigating it’s self nor should the DOJ.


75 posted on 05/25/2010 10:12:31 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

WHAT DID HE KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT!


76 posted on 05/25/2010 10:23:18 AM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I hope Sestak is paying attention and he is smart enough to know Obama via Axelrod called him a liar.

If that is not motivation to bring him down, I don’t know what is.


77 posted on 05/25/2010 12:14:51 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I am trying to figure out what Specter might know about this. He is in the puzzle somewhere.


78 posted on 05/25/2010 12:20:43 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

The Ax lecturing us on truth. Now that’s comedy.


79 posted on 05/25/2010 12:22:04 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson