Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy’s Projected Strike Fighter Shortfall in 2017 Based on Current Usage Rates
Defense Tech ^ | 5/24/2010 | Defense Tech

Posted on 05/24/2010 10:07:42 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The Navy held a conference call with reporters today to shoot down any rumors that it’s going soft on the carrier version (F-35C) of the Joint Strike Fighter in favor of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

The Navy intends to buy 124 Super Hornets in a multiyear purchase plan between FY 2010–2013, for a grand total of 515 F/A-18E/F/G aircraft, said Rear Adm. Mike Manazir, head of naval aviation programs.

But the fact that the Navy continues to buy large numbers of Super Hornets does not mean it doesn’t plan to buy even more F-35s, a true “game changing” 5th generation stealth aircraft, he said.

The Navy and Marines planned buy remains 680 JSFs, Manazir said. How many of that total will ultimately be the carrier version F-35C or the Marine’s short take-off and landing version F-35B, remains a topic of discussion between the two services.

On the much discussed Navy tactical strike fighter shortfall, Manazir said the worst case projections see the shortfall sitting at about 177 aircraft peaking in 2017. By tweaking “mitigation levers” — which includes how long older versions of the F-18 continue to fly, the delivery rate of new Super Hornets, how soon F-35s can begin to roll off the production line in large numbers and the demand from combatant commanders for carrier strike – that shortfall can be reduced to about 100 aircraft.

The current demand for F/A-18A-D flying off carriers in support of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan is “what is really stressing us right now,” he said. “If that demand signal was to decrease at some point then it would mitigate some of that shortfall.”

The Navy’s projections of a strike fighter shortfall are based on models that assume the Navy will continue flying carrier missions in support of counterinsurgency operations in Iraq

(Excerpt) Read more at defensetech.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aircraftcarrier; f18; f35c; jointstrikefighter; jsf; navair; navalaviation; superhornet; usmc; usnavy

1 posted on 05/24/2010 10:07:42 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove; Army Air Corps; Sparky1776; militant2; TaMoDee; freedumb2003

Bump and ping.


2 posted on 05/24/2010 10:12:51 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

The One cares not; there are some hoops to be played. Mahalo.


3 posted on 05/24/2010 10:17:40 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


4 posted on 05/24/2010 10:35:20 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

The F-35 (should be called a F/A-35) isn’t a game changer the navy didn’t build any kind of real fighter in this generation of fighters.


5 posted on 05/24/2010 10:55:40 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Yes but there’s probably other things already online for them including UAV’s


6 posted on 05/25/2010 5:41:38 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
I doubt UAV's will ever be good enough as a fighter against other capable countries, not in our life time at least. Attack planes yes but not fighters.

I know that is a dream a lot of people have but there is a lot of counter measures that could be used against them.

7 posted on 05/25/2010 11:06:43 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Yes you are correct. A man in the cockpit will always be better able to defeat the countermeasures.

That doesn’t mean that UAV’s cant augment him though.


8 posted on 05/25/2010 12:00:37 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
UAV's are great tools no doubt about that. But WHEN the day comes of who is going to take air/space superiority the UAV's will play a minor roll.

After Air/space superiority has been achieved only then will they be effective.

one good counter measure china has proven will be effective will be to make most satellites unusable by spraying space with massive amounts of trash. There by making most UAV's unusable.

9 posted on 05/25/2010 12:27:05 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Well it looks to me like a lot of the UAV’s we are designing could easily have a cockpit put in them, maybe they already thought of that too.


10 posted on 05/25/2010 12:29:53 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

11 posted on 05/25/2010 4:37:43 PM PDT by magslinger ("If I have money, I buy fishing gear. If I have money left over, I buy beer." - Hank Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson