Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Susan G. Komen and Planned Parenthood: Pro-Life People Should be Warned
Life News ^ | 5/24/10 | Hannah Carter

Posted on 05/24/2010 4:02:25 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Hannah Carter is the director of education for Georgia Right to Life, a statewide pro-life group. This opinion column originally appeared on the GRTL blog web site.

Like many families, my grandmother and great-grandmother both had breast cancer. The issue of wanting to fight what harms your family or friends is noble. So when I tell people that I do not support Susan G. Komen an organization that exists to “fight breast cancer”, I normally get the look of one: why would you abandon your family or two: oh there goes one of those extremist.

However, my reasons are not that extreme, but rather principled.

I'm sure many of you reading this article have also been confronted with the issue of if I ‘m pro-life then how can I support an organization that supports the nation’s leading abortion provider. Hopefully, the following principles can shed some light on how to respond sympathetically, yet firm with why you cannot wear pink, or join the race, or all the various ways that Susan G. Komen is supported.

Principle # 1 Don't give to organizations that promote the shedding of innocent blood.

If this were a list of commandments, we could start with Thou Shall Not Kill. However, Proverbs 6:17 states that one of the seven things God hates are hands that shed innocent blood.

Unfortunately, Susan G. Komen has given over $3 million dollars between 2003 and 2008 to Planned Parenthood which is the nation’s leading abortion provider.

While Susan G. Komen makes claims that these grants go for breast exams, once the funds go to Planned Parenthood they are fungible. For example, you can throw two twenty dollar bills into a purse one from a friend and one from your own account, but when you go to pay the light bill you use both.

The same is true with Planned Parenthood’s money it receives from Komen. Whenever someone applies for a grant they can say that while this $5,000 is going to breast cancer research, 20 percent of that money is going to pay for administrative costs like keeping the lights on and paying rent. So in essence, the money that people are raising to fight breast cancer is also going to keep the lights on at Planned Parenthood.

According to the 2008 Annual Report from Planned Parenthood, breast cancer services decreased by 4% and abortion procedures increased by 6%. In 2008, Susan G. Komen gave $731,000 to Planned Parenthood.

Principle # 2 Know and Recognize the Risk Factors for the Disease You are Trying to Prevent.

There are certain risks that can increase an individual’s chance of getting breast cancer. While Susan G. Komen says that they believe in knowing your risk factors, they have repeatedly denied the link between breast cancer and one of the greatest avoidable risk factors, abortion.

According to Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, “29 out of 38 worldwide epidemiological studies show an increased risk of breast cancer of approximately 30% among women who have had an abortion.”

When a woman has an abortion she interrupts the natural process of estrogen production and breast development. When a woman first becomes pregnant her body produces a Type 1 carcinogen, cancer causing agent, estrogen in order to nourish and provide for the baby. If the mother has her child, her body stops producing as much estrogen and her breasts mature. However, if that process is interrupted, the estrogen production continues and her breasts stay in an immature state, making them more susceptible to breast cancer.

Groups like Susan G. Komen acknowledge that the level of exposure to estrogen throughout a woman’s lifetime is one of the greatest predictors for breast cancer. Sadly, they do not acknowledge that the increased exposure to estrogen after an abortion could increase risks of breast cancer as well. For an organization whose primary goal is “to have a world without breast cancer”, you would think they would try to let women know of all the risk factors for breast cancer, especially those that are preventable like abortion.

Recently, in an article by Jill Stanek, pro-life author and blogger, asked a very thought-provoking question, “Is it really “morally permissible” to cause breast cancer in one room if screening for it in the next?”

Stanek also noted in her article that recently that the ties between Planned Parenthood and Susan G. Komen are running deeper and deeper. See an excerpt below from Stanek’s article:

Three days ago a diligent pro-lifer in Washington state discovered on Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest’s IRS 990 forms that it has held a 12.5 percent share in Metro Centre, a mall in Peoria, Ill., since 2006. PPGNW is Washington’s largest abortion provider. (It is also currently under investigation for Medicaid fraud.) Metro Centre is owned by Eric Brinker. Eric Brinker is the son of Nancy Goodman Brinker, the founder of SGK.

Eric also sits on SGK’s board. Eric was a stand-up guy and responded to most of my initial questions. He explained in an e-mail, “This share represents a minority, non-operating interest in the business which they inherited from one of the original shareholders, a resident of Peoria. I, Eric Brinker, have controlling interest in Metro Centre.” But when I pursued follow-up questions, Eric wrote he was no longer available. So there is much still unanswered. Why didn't PPGNW cash in its inheritance? Why didn't Eric buy? If the share was willed, it was worth something. The real-estate market was thriving in 2006. It appears both partners are OK with this now four-year-old business partnership.

In essence, Planned Parenthood and Susan G. Komen’s nephew own a mall together.

The bottom line is that Susan G. Komen is not accomplishing its mission every time it gives to Planned Parenthood.

Every time a woman has an abortion and part of the money to fund that center staying open came from Komen, they are putting women at a greater risk for breast cancer.

Every organization no matter how noble the cause they claim to represent seems to be needs to be held accountable.

The question is will you?

To continue your search for the ties between Susan G. Komen and Planned Parenthood, please visit:

Susan G. Komen for the Cure Awards 72 Grants to Planned Parenthood

Komen Giving to Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz Down as Donations Drop

Planned Parenthood Deepens Link to Breast Cancer Group

Susan G. Komen’s List of Grants to Planned Parenthood

Studies about the Link between Abortion and Breast Cancer

Report: Susan G. Komen and Planned Parenthood: A Visible Link



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abclink; abortion; angelalanfranchi; breastcancer; drangelalanfranchi; komen; moralabsolute; plannedparenthood; prolife; susangkomen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-212 last
To: rollo tomasi

Ok, so now am I supposed to extrapolate and assume that because one or both were advisors that they support abortion on demand?

Perhaps they do. Can you prove it?

If you can show me evidence that Komen’s board or chair supports abortion on demand then that is what I’ll go with.


201 posted on 06/02/2010 12:34:40 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (A blind clock finds a nut at least twice a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

I hope it helps.


202 posted on 06/02/2010 12:40:43 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; rollo tomasi; metmom; trisham; BykrBayb; redgolum; Desdemona; Hoosier Catholic Momma; ...
Ok, so now am I supposed to extrapolate and assume that because one or both were advisors that they support abortion on demand?

Would you care to enlighten us on the logical process by which one would give money to the largest abortion provider in the world if they DID NOT support what they were doing?

Perhaps they do. Can you prove it?

Unless the money was coerced by either force or false pretenses, a financial contribution to an organization is typically considered proof that you support what they do.

If you can show me evidence that Komen’s board or chair supports abortion on demand then that is what I’ll go with.

Does Nancy Brinker being on the advisory board of the North Texas Planned Parenthood count or is she not all that important?

203 posted on 06/02/2010 1:06:18 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
Until then, the Komen Foundation supports abortion through thought as well as deed without hesitation what so ever. Komen herself was an adviser so, let us shift some funds to her cronies at Planned Parenthood. Lovely Foundation that sponsors an organization that murders, no matter how you protest, it is what it (Already documented) is.

Says you. Komen says differently. I haven't seen you supply any documentation that refutes Komen's statement. Komen says that they do not fund abortions and no one yet has shown me anything that proves they do.

They say they provide grants for breast cancer services and monitor to ensure that their grant monies are spent only in compliance with their agreements and not for abortions.

Didn't Jesus accuse the pharisees of swallowing camels and straining at gnats?

204 posted on 06/02/2010 1:12:58 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (A blind clock finds a nut at least twice a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; rollo tomasi; metmom; trisham; BykrBayb; redgolum; Desdemona; Hoosier Catholic Momma; ...
Says you. Komen says differently. I haven't seen you supply any documentation that refutes Komen's statement. Komen says that they do not fund abortions and no one yet has shown me anything that proves they do.

Do you believe that Nancy Brinker has any influence over where the Komen money goes? Assuming she does, it has been widely reported (and NEVER denied) that she served on Planned Parenthood advisory boards in the past. Do you believe that people who serve on Planned Parenthood advisory boards support abortion or are you going to dispute that too?

They say they provide grants for breast cancer services and monitor to ensure that their grant monies are spent only in compliance with their agreements and not for abortions.

Do you even have a passing understanding of what overhead is?

Didn't Jesus accuse the pharisees of swallowing camels and straining at gnats?

Are you now suggesting that the Lord Jesus Christ would SUPPORT giving money to an organization that kills babies?

205 posted on 06/02/2010 1:38:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

bump


206 posted on 06/02/2010 1:46:47 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Sorry to upset ya ! I try to be careful on my direct donations, but I can’t prevent ALL my dollars from somehow getting to Planned Parenthood somehow...what you’re saying, I assume, is that it’s more a matter of the dollar amounts and the intention?


207 posted on 06/02/2010 1:47:22 PM PDT by magritte ("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: magritte

It’s nearly impossible to keep money from going to organizations we don’t like. However, when a person gives money to an organization like Komen, they shouldn’t have to wonder if that money is going to Planned Parenthood, this is very different from eating at a fast food restaurant or staying in a hotel.

Many people seem to think that Komen is the only organization fighting breast cancer and that before Komen it was just ignored and this is totally false.


208 posted on 06/02/2010 1:54:14 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; magritte
Imho, the more we know about these organizations, the more we can support those that do conform to our ideals and principles. While there may be those who don't care if they support abortion, there are many who do care.

Thanks to wagglebee for educating us about this one.

209 posted on 06/02/2010 2:08:39 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: magritte; wagglebee
I’m really surprised at your statement about women over 40 not going to PP...they offer a huge range of services including flu vaccinations, cholesterol screenings, thyroid checks and all kinds of other stuff...PP is not just an abortion mill, it’s a one-stop for a bunch of services unrelated to abortion or “Reproductive services”...

(Yeah, I hear the Nazis put out some really great "skin lampshades" during WWII...Those gas chambers weren't just mass killing machines, it was a one-stop for a bunch of products...)

210 posted on 06/10/2010 6:28:33 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Why Mrs. Godwin...you waited quite a while to make an appearance on this thread...

Sheesh...
211 posted on 06/10/2010 6:30:25 AM PDT by magritte ("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

So, get an abortion while you wait for a breast cancer screening?

What will they think of next to lure women into those murder factories? Pap screens and just perform the abortion while they’re there?

Anything with Susan G. Komen on it is now cause for extreme prejudice in my household.


212 posted on 06/10/2010 7:23:46 PM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-212 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson