Replies

What studies? Where are your statistics? The studies paid for and results decided in advance for the “proof” of the “safety” of vaccines done by the very agencies that make them and try to get their products on the market?

The children that were followed for two weeks???? is proof?????? that no damage is done????????? HA HA HA
You are telling me they understand everything that happens to the body when they inject known toxins into that body in an unnatural way and there is NO HARM? What a crock!!!!! Read the LISTS on all drugs and vaccines of the possible side effects. HA HA HA! GEEEEEZZZZZ!

By trying to discredit all studies, which linked damage resulting from vaccines? Why did they get stuck paying damages for their vaccines in court cases?

THEY KNOW THEIR ARE RISKS!!!!!! WHY ALL THE LIABILITY LAWS?????!!!!!

A study from Finland, designed to be large enough pick up even very rare events, followed 1.8 million children prospectively from the day they received the MMR vaccine for a full 14 years. The total number of reported vaccine-associated events was 437, and they included allergic reactions and convulsions, but none of the children had autism linked with the vaccine.

Several subsequent studies, all much larger and better designed than Wakefield’s, have confirmed an absence of excess cases of autism or bowel disease in children who have received MMR vaccine. In 1999, for example, Dr Brent Taylor looked at 500 cases of autism in the Royal Free Hospital and found no excess in immunised children. A very large and well designed study in the USA – with a proper case control design and with all vaccination dates confirmed by medical records – looked at the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in people who had received MMR vaccine, other measles-containing vaccine, and no vaccine. The risk of inflammatory bowel disease was the same for vaccinated or unvaccinated people. The average time between vaccination and the development of bowel disease was 12 years. Only 1% of cases developed inflammatory bowel disease within a year of vaccination – and 1% of controls developed inflammatory bowel disease during the same time period. This study was cited in the medical journal ‘Bandolier’ and its results are available free online on http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/index.html

In conclusion, the Wakefield study was scientifically flawed on numerous counts. I am surprised that neither the editor nor the reviewers spotted these flaws when the paper was submitted. Had they done so, the public would have been saved the confusion and anxiety caused by false credibility conveyed by publication of the study in this prestigious journal.

Source

The children that were followed for two weeks???? is proof??????

Yeah, that's what Wakefield did, now it's a bad thing? LOL!

Any luck on the mercury numbers? Or were you making stuff up again?