When I’ve got my tin-foil hat on, I sniff a possibility that the reason for the back-off on coverage by both the media and politicians (of both parties, it appears), is because there’s some well-informed concern that there might have been terrorism involved. If that’s what’s going on, I’d just as soon it’s kept quiet. It wouldn’t do a bit of good to splash any evidence suggesting that into the public domain, and it would cause massive disruption in the already very fragile financial markets.
ping (to my post at #60)
Am I missing something here?