Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Setting traps for uranium
Highlights in Chemical Science ^ | 21 May 2010 | Yuandi Li

Posted on 05/23/2010 8:58:49 PM PDT by neverdem

It could be possible to get uranium from seawater in the future, claim US scientists who have devised a new way to extract uranyl ions from aqueous solutions.

With the rapid depletion of fossil fuels, the search for alternative power sources is becoming increasingly important. One alternative is nuclear fission, making uranium - the fuel used in nuclear reactors - an important target for isolation. Although uranium is currently extracted from solid ores such as uraninite, it also exists in large quantities as uranyl ions (UO22+) in seawater. However, due to its distinctive shape that prevents the use of conventional chelating ligands, sequestering the uranyl ion from seawater has remained a challenge. 

The uranyl ion binds well with carboxylates, and encasing the ion in an apolar environment stabilises electrostatic interactions and enhances intermolecular forces explains Julius Rebek Jr at Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla. Rebek's team discovered that when three bidentate 2,6-terphenyl carboxylic acid ligands coordinate to the ion, their bulky phenyl groups form a cage around it shielding it from any water. This complex can then be extracted from solution in various ways depending on the type of medium it is in. 

Carboxylic acid ligands around uranium

Carboxylic acid ligands coordinate to the ion forming a cage around it


'There are about 4.5 billion tons of dissolved uranium in the ocean. This is nearly 1000 times more than the terrestrial uranium sources in the western world,' says Orion Berryman, a member of the research team. 'Our work addresses the challenges of uranium extraction from a unique perspective - isolating the uranium atom from its native environment through encapsulation.' 

'It's certainly confronting a significant problem and it's an interesting piece of work,' says Jack Harrowfield, an expert in coordination chemistry at Louis Pasteur University in Strasbourg, France. 'But it needs to be shown that it is selective,' he adds. 

Rebek and his colleagues now plan to address this problem by developing ligands that will exhibit a higher affinity for uranium, which will also allow its extraction at much lower concentrations than currently possible. 

Link to journal article

Encapsulation of the uranyl dication
Stephan Beer, Orion B. Berryman, Dariush Ajami and Julius Rebek Jr., Chem. Sci., 2010
DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00116c

Also of interest

Basic extraction of uranium

Coordination complexes that can remove radioactive elements from the environment have been developed by US scientists.

Uranium chemistry: the final frontier

Scientists have made new uranium compounds for the future of nuclear power

Interview: Something in the water

Bibudhendra Sarkar talks about metalloenzymes, helping sick children and hunting for toxic metals in the environment


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: chemistry; energy; uranium
FReebie is linked to the abstract.
1 posted on 05/23/2010 8:58:49 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

i wonder how well this process could work if adapted to cleaning up radioactive contamination...like at bikini atoll for example...


2 posted on 05/23/2010 9:04:25 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
With the rapid depletion of fossil fuels

Oh my!

3 posted on 05/23/2010 9:04:37 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
With the rapid depletion of fossil fuels

I knew not to bother to read any further. If they can't get that right, they have no business pretending to be science writers.

4 posted on 05/23/2010 9:13:20 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’m inclined to see thorium-based fuels as a better alternative to the use of uranium. It is more plentiful, safer and easier to transport.


5 posted on 05/23/2010 9:17:01 PM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Hehe... he said uranyl ions.


6 posted on 05/23/2010 9:17:29 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
With the rapid depletion of fossil fuels, the search for alternative power sources is becoming increasingly important.

Increased use doesn't equal rapid depletion. Current use has barely scratched the surface of what is available. Still, replacing as much power generation as possible with nuclear will spare so-called fossil fuels for chemical uses.
7 posted on 05/23/2010 9:22:01 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

8 posted on 05/23/2010 9:29:36 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory
i wonder how well this process could work if adapted to cleaning up radioactive contamination...like at bikini atoll for example...

It would not work very well at all.

The really bad actors in radioactive contamination are the fission products of uranium, which are other elements.

9 posted on 05/23/2010 10:45:39 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The oceans pu t together may contain 1000 times as much uranium as in the mines on land — but in how much water? It is going to have to be cost effective to filter it out, before the oceans can be “mined” for uranium.


10 posted on 05/23/2010 11:54:51 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bflr


11 posted on 05/23/2010 11:55:16 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

true but aii of ‘the easy oil’ is getting gone. So we got to start looking elsewhere IMO.


12 posted on 05/24/2010 3:23:12 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Do you think a similar process could be used to trap those particles?


13 posted on 05/24/2010 4:56:41 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"It is going to have to be cost effective to filter it out, before the oceans can be “mined” for uranium."

Well, that "is" the point of the technology described. Probably looking to do solvent extraction. Convert the uranyl ions into species "relatively" insoluble in water, but highly soluble in an organic, separate the immiscible phases, "break" the complex to free the uranium. Recycle the chelating agent and organic solvent.

14 posted on 05/24/2010 4:56:58 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Put the windmills to work....


15 posted on 05/24/2010 3:34:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks neverdem.
'There are about 4.5 billion tons of dissolved uranium in the ocean. This is nearly 1000 times more than the terrestrial uranium sources in the western world,' says Orion Berryman, a member of the research team.
"The half-life of uranium- 238 is about 4.47 billion years and that of uranium-235 is 704 million years" [wackipedia]
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

16 posted on 05/24/2010 4:35:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Uranium fission is soooo 20th century. Let's go to the moon for He-3 for fusion.
17 posted on 05/24/2010 4:45:26 PM PDT by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Nuke alert.


18 posted on 05/24/2010 6:50:11 PM PDT by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson