Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Retired Intelligence Officer
It's confirmed that Obama used a Connecticut Social Security card when he never lived there. He also registered when he was 19 instead of 18.

So. What does not living in CT have to do with a SSN that comes from a branch located in CT? Nothing. This has been explained numerous times on other threads. You can also do a google and get info to see how the system worked prior to 1971. At that time the SSN area number (1st 3 digits) had nothing to do with a person's address. It represented the branch that assigned the number. Normally one would expect a SS branch closer to Hawaii than CT would have handled it but who knows what happened. This in of itself means nothing.

23 posted on 05/23/2010 5:09:51 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

I’ve never seen the explanations you claim were posted here. What I do know is the first three digits of a SSN are assigned by state and your SSN tracks to your state of residence where you resided before a certain date and afterwards where you were born when you where first claimed on a tax return as a dependent. I’m sure if the parents moved to a different state than that of the birth and then got a SSN for their kid for tax purposes that might explain a difference. But CT? No way.

Obama having a CT SSN defies logic.


33 posted on 05/23/2010 5:27:40 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
At that time the SSN area number (1st 3 digits) had nothing to do with a person's address. It represented the branch that assigned the number

but the numbers still match the person as a person living in the state of issue...ie, not to do with the address WITHIN the state - but still as an occupant OF THAT STATE

39 posted on 05/23/2010 5:32:39 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

bullshit!


47 posted on 05/23/2010 5:54:13 PM PDT by ldish (Looking forward to Independence Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
You can also do a google and get info to see how the system worked prior to 1971. At that time...

At that time, did Obama have a SSN? He would have been 10 years old. When was his first time of employment when he would have needed one?

-PJ

49 posted on 05/23/2010 5:55:24 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

Sorry, I aint going for it

In fact, here’s a little secret that servicemen know

When you check ID’s in the Chow Hall, you always look at the women’s SSN to see where they are from, to see if she is from your home state

Now I did this in 1977-1981. I got my SSN in 70. I registered early

I have the right number for my state. So did the WM’s whose ID’s I checked. I find it hard to believe that system was that far different.


53 posted on 05/23/2010 6:03:19 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk; meatloaf
You can also do a google and get info to see how the system worked prior to 1971. At that time the SSN area number (1st 3 digits) had nothing to do with a person's address. It represented the branch that assigned the number. Normally one would expect a SS branch closer to Hawaii than CT would have handled it but who knows what happened. This in of itself means nothing.

Yes, prior to 1971 it represented the branch that assigned the number however the card had to be applied for at the social security office from which it was issued. Seeing as Obama ( according to his autobiography) did not step foot on the mainland for the first time until 1972, applying form the Conn office would have been impossible.

From the Social Security site:

Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office.

That means they had to apply for the card in the office from which it was issued.

125 posted on 05/23/2010 8:39:07 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

BS. I received a SSN in the late 60’s that corresponds to AZ and corresponded to my address.


130 posted on 05/23/2010 8:48:19 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk; Retired Intelligence Officer

That specific SS# is recycled from a diseased person???


136 posted on 05/23/2010 8:54:08 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
What does not living in CT have to do with a SSN that comes from a branch located in CT? Nothing. This has been explained numerous times on other threads. You can also do a google and get info to see how the system worked prior to 1971. At that time the SSN area number (1st 3 digits) had nothing to do with a person's address. It represented the branch that assigned the number. Normally one would expect a SS branch closer to Hawaii than CT would have handled it but who knows what happened. This in of itself means nothing.

In '73, Obama turned 12. (in '71 he turned 10) In those days you did not need a SSN for a dependent. Nor for a passport. You didn't need one until you started working. So unless you think he got his job at Basking Robbins when he was 11 or 12, his number would reflect his mailing address on the application. So when did he have a CT mailing address?

187 posted on 05/23/2010 10:48:21 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
This has been explained numerous times on other threads.

No matter how many times something is explained, these things continue to spread. It's the nature of a conspiracy theory.

249 posted on 05/24/2010 9:16:51 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson