Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby Gap: Germany's Birth Rate Hits Historic Low
Time ^ | May 23, 2010 | Tristana Moore

Posted on 05/23/2010 4:27:15 PM PDT by C19fan

Germany is shrinking — and fast. New figures released on May 17 show the birth rate in Europe's biggest economy has plummeted to a historic low, dropping to a level not seen since 1946. As demographers warn of the consequences of not making enough babies to replace and support an ageing population, the latest figures have triggered a bout of national soul-searching and cast a harsh light on Chancellor Angela Merkel's family policies.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Germany
KEYWORDS: birth; birthrate; deathofthewest; germany; population
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
I wonder if you take away the Muzzie population in Germany, mainly Turks, how much lower the fertility rate is. In the past when you had a vacuum like this some foreign people would take over.
1 posted on 05/23/2010 4:27:16 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Unprecedented

Unexpected

W's fault.

2 posted on 05/23/2010 4:32:14 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I’m more interested in knowing why Germans do not want families anymore?

I would firstly speculate that it is because both adults have to work to support themselves adequately due to a high taxation rate. It takes time and effort to bear and rear children correctly, so families with one child predominate. Combine that with the propaganda about the environment and there is additional cultural pressure to have one-child families.

Socialism and environmentalism look like the culprits to me. The same situation holds true for other nations where socialism and the enviromental craze have taken root.


3 posted on 05/23/2010 4:33:37 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Pinging Mark Steyn.


4 posted on 05/23/2010 4:34:04 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Whatever you do, don’t be flippant and blame socialism for it.
5 posted on 05/23/2010 4:35:15 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Unprecedented

Unexpected

W's fault.

Although with precedent it's expected and with no help from Dubya', you have pegged it with true savvy Paladin2.

: )

6 posted on 05/23/2010 4:41:36 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
This is where some government intervention might be called for, as maybe cutting tax rates by- saỵ 25% for a first child and 50% for subsequent children with actual subsidies for the 5th child.
7 posted on 05/23/2010 4:41:48 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
As demographers warn of the consequences of not making enough babies to replace and support an ageing population

Helloooooo!!! "Supporting an aging population" isn't a reason people should be having babies. Human society isn't supposed to be a pyramid scheme. The aged population should have worked hard and made large contributions to their society's physical and intellectual capital, sufficient to support themselves in their old age, and preferably with surplus to enhance the lives of the younger generations as well.

The first full generation of Germans to spend their lives as wards of a socialist welfare state are now hitting what they imagine should be retirement-at-leisure age. It takes some serious audacity for them (and others purporting to speak on their behalf) to complain that the cash-strapped, tax-crushed current generation of young adults is failing to do their patriotic duty of making enough babies to support the elderly. The current elderly generation is the one that allowed the pyramid scheme of socialism to take hold in the first place, and they sure aren't offering to give up their mountain of government-guaranteed old age benefits so that the younger generation can afford to have more children.

8 posted on 05/23/2010 4:42:12 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Social engineering via tax codes is ALWAYS bad and ALWAYS antithetical to freedom. Just slash the tax rates, period, and let people make their own choices about what to do with their own money. Many of them will have more children, but others won’t. That’s called freedom.

And the budget cuts to compensate for the initial drop in tax revenue from slashed rates need to hit the generation that’s responsible for this mess, namely those now hitting retirement age, who presided over a massive expansion of socialist welfare programs because they wanted hand-outs for themselves.


9 posted on 05/23/2010 4:45:48 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

It’s just too much work to make a baby nowadays.


10 posted on 05/23/2010 4:45:48 PM PDT by donhunt (I used to have a US senator who lived in a compound. He's dead now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Populations with high birth rates are populations for whom children are profitable to the parents. Some or all of them are earning their food by age 10 or 12 and adding income to the family shortly thereafter. They are also the social security for the parents. Social Security is probably the largest single contributor to the birth dearth. Parents don’t have to rely on their children to support them in their old age. Consequently also, respect foe old folks declines with social security because the kids don’t have to take care of Mom and Pop and thus don’t live with them.


11 posted on 05/23/2010 4:46:28 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Bingo.


12 posted on 05/23/2010 4:48:51 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

“Helloooooo!!! “Supporting an aging population” isn’t a reason people should be having babies. Human society isn’t supposed to be a pyramid scheme. The aged population should have worked hard and made large contributions to their society’s physical and intellectual capital, sufficient to support themselves in their old age, and preferably with surplus to enhance the lives of the younger generations as well.”

That is a modern/western perspective, but families were stronger when the younger did help care for the older.


13 posted on 05/23/2010 4:49:41 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; All
I’m more interested in knowing why Germans do not want families anymore?

PSST, don't spread it around but socialism makes it way too expensive for anyone to take the initiative to risk financial "change" and add burden to maintaining financial survival as a family.

14 posted on 05/23/2010 4:49:42 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I read that there is a 50% energy tax in Germany. People have to unplugg their appliances at night to avoid going broke. I sure that the intended consequence of all these 'green' taxes is that people are too financially crunched to have children.

Europe is gone...

15 posted on 05/23/2010 4:56:31 PM PDT by Lobsterback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Yeah, the Muslims are taking over Europe, just on that one thing alone ... babies ... and the U.S. will be taken over by Muslims on that same basis, in a generation or two ...

See the following from another post of mine...


That evil and oppressive governmental idealogy of Islam and the way of implementing it by Sharia law is already making inroads right here in this country — the good ole USA. We’re about to see a “takeover” of the U.S. by the evil and oppressive idealogy of the government of Islam (that is aiming for world-wide conquest and has stated that the U.S. is *on its list* to take over...)

And for those people who need some additional facts about what the evil and oppressive governmental idealogy of Islam is doing, look at some of the following.

There’s no question about it... the enemy is *Islam* itself and the evil and oppressive and false idealogy that it perpetrates. Some say the problem is “fascism” (instead of the basic oppressive governmental idealogy of Islam, itself). But, that is to engage in “political correctness” and nothing more... and sidetracks people from the *true enemy* in this war.

In one generation we’ll see, right here in the United States that “Islam” is the enemy and not “fascism”...

Muslim Demographics...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

and also, this...

Islam: What the West Needs to Know - FULL LENGTH ENGLISH VERSION
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-871902797772997781

and then, looking at this...

“The Third Jihad” (video - abridged version of film)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2271522/posts

This is the allowance of “false gods” to take over this nation because of the ignorance of the people of the land in regards to the true God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob...

And so, we see that we’re going to have the “false god of Islam” ruling over the USA and running the USA in just one generation from now.

16 posted on 05/23/2010 4:59:53 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
You were saying ...

Socialism and environmentalism look like the culprits to me. The same situation holds true for other nations where socialism and the enviromental craze have taken root.

What I've read about it in the past, is that the more advanced and successful the country (you know like third world countries and/or Western nations) the fewer kids they have. So, as people themselves become more succesful, the birth rate goes down. There might be some exceptions for some religious preferences (a couple of groups I can think of).

But, Muslims... they just take over by sheer numbers and they're due to take over this country in a generation or two.

17 posted on 05/23/2010 5:03:23 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

“Social engineering via tax codes is ALWAYS bad and ALWAYS antithetical to freedom. Just slash the tax rates, period, and let people make their own choices about what to do with their own money. Many of them will have more children, but others won’t. That’s called freedom.”

The social engineering was done decades ago with the invention of the Pill, legalization of abortion, and the mainstreaming of women into college and into the workplace. Put another way - children get in the way.

So the question is whether we let this social engineering run its course and DESTROY Western Society, which it’s well on its way to doing - or does the West take REAL steps to address the problem? I doubt you want that outcome - but it WILL happen, probably in a couple of decades in Europe, and then later here.

As to tax cuts, fine - but they won’t do crap for this problem - it simply isn’t the issue.

Also note that cultures that did not and have not participated in this social engineering experiment decades ago (i.e., Islamic countries) do not have the population issues that we are dealing with.


18 posted on 05/23/2010 5:12:45 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I’m more interested in knowing why Germans do not want families anymore?

They've bought into the environmentalist line that there are too many people. German women are some of the most selfish creatures walking the face of the earth. Boy do I ever know this. They can't be bothered with having children when there are more important things like travel and leisure.

There are also politics. Germans have been beaten to a pulp by the West since the end of WW2 and have a bad feeling about themselves. So they don't produce. It's a very sad situation. Germany is committing suicide. They care more about having a nice car or nice vacation than continuing their civilization. Tragic that we are losing on of the world's great civilizations. Blame Liberalism. Northern Italy is just as bad.
19 posted on 05/23/2010 5:12:57 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

In a classic case of confusing cause and effect, I give you the following text from a hotlink in the article: “See why the recssion is causing women to have fewer kids.”

There are other doozies in the article, like blaming the quality of government child care. As if civil society has always had government child care, but the quality of it has just now declined to the point where it is impacting the birth rate.


20 posted on 05/23/2010 5:13:15 PM PDT by Doohickey (I try to take my days one at a time, but occasionally several days attack me at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson